Comments on: 3 Minors Arrested For “Sexting” http://pervscan.com/2009/03/30/3-minors-arrested-for-sexting/ An Index to the Sordid and Depraved Sun, 25 Mar 2012 06:21:31 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Anonimous http://pervscan.com/2009/03/30/3-minors-arrested-for-sexting/comment-page-1/#comment-29768 Anonimous Wed, 01 Apr 2009 23:02:19 +0000 http://pervscan.com/2009/03/30/3-minors-arrested-for-sexting/#comment-29768 Sven is right. If minors are allowed to fuck somenone of their age group, such as the states that allow it within certain boundaries then it should follow that they should have naked pictures of themselves, preferably as long as they don't show them to others. Sven is right. If minors are allowed to fuck somenone of their age group, such as the states that allow it within certain boundaries then it should follow that they should have naked pictures of themselves, preferably as long as they don’t show them to others.

]]> By: furpo http://pervscan.com/2009/03/30/3-minors-arrested-for-sexting/comment-page-1/#comment-29766 furpo Wed, 01 Apr 2009 18:29:10 +0000 http://pervscan.com/2009/03/30/3-minors-arrested-for-sexting/#comment-29766 Heres an update on one of the sexting cases, not the one Supervert posted but another one I sent in. US judge rules for teen girls in "sexting" case 3/30/2009 A U.S. judge on Monday barred a Pennsylvania prosecutor from filing child pornography charges against three teenage girls caught with sexually suggestive pictures of themselves on their cell phones. U.S. District Judge James Munley said he was issuing a restraining order on Wyoming County District Attorney George Skumanick because his proposed action would violate freedom of speech and parental rights. (more) http://www.reuters.com/article/mediaNews/idUSN3034377920090331?pageNumber=2&virtualBrandChannel=0&sp=true Heres an update on one of the sexting cases, not the one Supervert posted but another one I sent in.

US judge rules for teen girls in “sexting” case
3/30/2009
A U.S. judge on Monday barred a Pennsylvania prosecutor from filing child pornography charges against three teenage girls caught with sexually suggestive pictures of themselves on their cell phones.

U.S. District Judge James Munley said he was issuing a restraining order on Wyoming County District Attorney George Skumanick because his proposed action would violate freedom of speech and parental rights. (more)

http://www.reuters.com/article/mediaNews/idUSN3034377920090331?pageNumber=2&virtualBrandChannel=0&sp=true

]]> By: Sven http://pervscan.com/2009/03/30/3-minors-arrested-for-sexting/comment-page-1/#comment-29765 Sven Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:42:28 +0000 http://pervscan.com/2009/03/30/3-minors-arrested-for-sexting/#comment-29765 I've always thought the idea of charging children for child pornography when its pictures of their lovers or themselves was absurd. Sure, it's possible to be a minor and possess child pornograph in a legitimately illegal way - 16 year olds can access those Russian sites just as well as 18 year olds - but it seems to me that the law should turn the other cheek when it comes to pictures of people these kids are seeing naked anyway. Especially in states where sex between minors is legal within certain boundaries; if you're allowed to fuck someone, you should be allowed to have naked pictures of that person, too. The distribution without the girl's consent, however, is something that I agree should be punishable. Anything of this nature done without consent should be illegal, of course. Also: thank you for writing "On the other hand, if the behavior isn’t criminalized, it opens up the possibility that real child pornographers can induce young people to create the pornography which it is illegal for adults to produce themselves." I had never looked at it that way, and it clears up some of the issues I've had with the way the law treats these cases. I’ve always thought the idea of charging children for child pornography when its pictures of their lovers or themselves was absurd. Sure, it’s possible to be a minor and possess child pornograph in a legitimately illegal way – 16 year olds can access those Russian sites just as well as 18 year olds – but it seems to me that the law should turn the other cheek when it comes to pictures of people these kids are seeing naked anyway. Especially in states where sex between minors is legal within certain boundaries; if you’re allowed to fuck someone, you should be allowed to have naked pictures of that person, too.

The distribution without the girl’s consent, however, is something that I agree should be punishable. Anything of this nature done without consent should be illegal, of course.

Also: thank you for writing “On the other hand, if the behavior isn’t criminalized, it opens up the possibility that real child pornographers can induce young people to create the pornography which it is illegal for adults to produce themselves.” I had never looked at it that way, and it clears up some of the issues I’ve had with the way the law treats these cases.

]]>