The more humans set themselves away from nature, the more ‘unnatural’ they become, and it completely ‘dismisses’ the attitude of saying ‘that’s unnatural, and hence is wrong’; everything will become ‘wrong’, even though it is ’seemingly’ ‘right’, and we’d forget the purpose of such social and political law; ‘perversion of freedom’, or ‘food for thought’, choose, don’t suppress others over your choice, if they have an opposing opinion, unless they are doing the same to you; only then should fights take place between ‘parties’, even with ‘non-consent’.

We ARE natural, but we should follow the most sensible degree of standards for our own survival, as a tribe of Primates (humankind classes themselves as ONE international tribe, by allowing international alliances; which makes us too big an arrogant, moving towards money and power, instead of ’safe’ freedom).

Humans still class it as ‘unnatural’, but deflect the argument again, by saying, ‘we don’t copy the animals; we shouldn’t act like them, we’re better’; despite the question, ‘what are we better at then, zoosexuality?’, which would lead to ‘that’s wrong, I didn’t mean that’; humans like to think they have a higher importance than animals, and set away from them, and at the same time, are scrapping all truths.

Let’s say a dog, in the wild, a dog wants territory, his pad where he can say to anyone who enters his ‘pack’, ‘you’re mine’, even if they don’t want sex now; they want to tell their potential mate, ‘you’re for later’.

Basically all ‘Mammals’ have a consciousness, as proved, and hence can ‘consent’, just like we can.

Love is capable by all Mammals, Reptiles, and Aves, that’s for certain.