Contact PervScan RSS Feed Banners for PervScan
 
PervScan is for adults only. If you are under 18, you must leave now.

Wiggle While You Walk

Scientists have found they can gauge how likely a woman is to experience an orgasm during sex, just by watching the way she walks. The length of your stride and the flexibility of your spine are give-aways to whether or not you have easy orgasms. Trained sexologists were 80pc accurate in a study of female university students when they watched video-tapes of the women walking. The tapes were rates by two professors of sexology and two research assistants trained in the functional-sexological approach to sexology. Students who took part completed a questionnaire on their sexual behaviour and then agreed to be videotaped from a distance while walking in a public place. The results showed that the appropriately trained sexologists were able to accurately tell how easily a woman reached orgasm in eight out of 10 cases. Further analysis revealed that the length of their stride and spinal flexibility was greater in the ‘vaginally orgasmic women’. ‘This could reflect the free, unblocked energetic flow from the legs through the pelvis to the spine,’ say the authors. The study in the current Journal of Sexual Medicine, was carried out by the University of West Scotland in collaboration with colleagues in Belgium. The authors concluded that the results provided some support for assumptions that there is a link between muscle block and sexual function. They hope the results could help to treat sexual dysfunction by incorporating the information into movement and breathing training for the condition.” — Herald (Ireland)

You can find the full text of the article “A Woman’s History of Vaginal Orgasm is Discernible from Her Walk” at the Journal of Sexual Medicine. Dr Petra Boynton, a noted sexologist, has written a substantial critique of the research on her blog. She points out, among other things, that the researchers may harbor a subtle bias, since one member of the team has previously published research claiming that “penis-vagina intercourse is 400% ‘better’ than other forms of sex and heterosexual sex is superior.” Surely any sharp-minded reader would like to know the criteria by which genital intercourse is deemed superior to, say, oral or anal. (Ok, Chris Finch, we know you like anal, we know…)

But let’s assume for a second that this research is one hundred percent accurate. Suppose you really can extrapolate from a woman’s walk whether or not she is capable of full-bore vaginal orgasms. What, then, are you supposed to do with this information? How is it meaningful or actionable? Should men spurn dates with women who don’t sport a hip-swinging strut? Would women begin to practice and imitate such gaits, the same as some now stuff their bras or get breast implants to enhance their appeal (er, to conform to the notion of appealingness that they inherit from the zeitgeist)? It’s all so ridiculous. Besides, relatively few guys would care if their female partners were capable of vaginal orgasms. Unfortunately, it’s their own orgasms they usually care most about.

 
Comments Total: 5
snakebite survivor
Sep 15 2008
2:40 am

Oh brother! The “400 percent better” figure is discussed at
http://www.drpetra.co.uk/blog/?p=317
and it appears that the “noted sexologist” seems to confuse “400 times better” and “400 percent better”. Can we be excused for feeling that the study of sexology is not fully mature yet?

Jim Pickett
Sep 16 2008
8:01 am

The 400% better stat is indeed interesting. Be that as it may, MANY heteroseuxal folks engage in anal intercourse the world over – quite commonly in places where virginity is especially prized and/or contraception in not readily accessible. Anywhere between 10 to 40% of women have had/have anal intercourse – and when it is unprotected (and most heterosexual anal intercourse is) – it is more likely than unprotected vaginal intercourse to result in an HIV transmission.

Currently in development, a microbicide is a cream or gel, or maybe a douche or an enema, that could be used to reduce a person’s risk of HIV infection vaginally or rectally. Rectal microbicides could offer both primary protection in the absence of condoms and back-up protection if a condom breaks or slips off during anal intercourse. For those unable or unwilling to use condoms, rectal microbicides could be a safe and effective alternative means of reducing risk, especially if they were unobtrusive and/or enhanced sexual pleasure enough to motivate consistent use. Such alternatives are essential if we are to address the full spectrum of prevalent sexual practices and the basic human need for accessible, user-controlled HIV and STD prevention tools.

Learn more here http://www.rectalmicrobicides.org

ladycara
Sep 16 2008
10:08 am

don’t most women wear high heels anyway, that tilt the pelvis and make them sway as they walk.
so i want to know if this study was done in high heels or without high heels.
i wear high heels but only for special occasions. if this study was done with high heels i’ll start wearing them all the time.

Krovas
Sep 16 2008
11:42 pm

Women should be required by law to wear high heels in public at least once a week.

Husk
Sep 23 2008
10:42 am

Funny; Having read this, I watched a certain girl walk down the road the other day. ” Like a fucking train!!! “, I thought to myself! :D

Add Comment  
Comment Policy

All comments become the property of PervScan. You must use an email address to post a comment. However, PervScan disallows email addresses in the text of comments.

Required and published
Required but not published