Husk is correct, dogs have a tendency to rip anyone apart, if they want to; even when loyalty is present, they don’t put up with something like that, unless they like it; if they like it, there’s nothing wrong.

The only time a dog won’t consent, but submits to its ‘offender’ ‘bestialist’ ‘owner’, is when it is beaten into accepting what he/she doesn’t want; and then sadism has taken place, and sadism is animal cruelty, fair and square, that’s bad, and should be illegal; the animal was made to suffer to succumb to his dastardly deeds.

If he beat the dog into accepting sexual intrusion, he is being cruel to his dog, and hence, for the dogs physical and psychological safety, should have been taken to another home.

If he’s a bestialist (takes hold of the animal, without consent), he’s at his own risk of being bitten, for holding the dog, and ‘penetrating’ it.

Erotic zoophiles, on the other hand, have sex with their dogs with full consent, and don’t hold the dog down, whatsoever, so the dog can freely ‘run away’, and he’d just ‘pop out’; if the dog enjoys it (highly likely for such an affectionate and hedonistic species); if the dog and the human were in a strongly emotional, lustrious, romantic, and lovingly passionate relationship (like the inventive ‘ideal’ human-human one), the dog and human would have sex to please each other via the use of highly pleasurable affectionate stimulation; this kind of zoosexuality is the most common one, and hidden zoophiles all around the world have this kind of relationship in private.

A zoophilic relationship often starts off with obtaining an animal, getting deeply emotionally involved with it, and then getting so deeply affectionate, the highest way of pleasing each other is reached, ‘making love’, yes not ‘taking advantage’.

I’ve investigated the lives of zoophiles, and most of them are just like any other human, it wasn’t out of desperation or illness, or anything, it was ‘orientative’, because they had an attraction ‘romantically’ and/or ’sexually’ towards such a species, that they preferred, above all.

There’s the xenophilic zoophiles, who chose ‘zoophilia’ just to be different to others, or ’special’, because socially, they had low self-esteem, and wanted that little boost in life; a lot of these inhibit true zoophilia, and are harmless if they keep to zoophilic standards.

And there’s also the true zoophiles, who ‘accidentally’ became erotic zoophiles, by having a direct bond with the animal, that grew (like I described earlier in the article), from affection to a full-blown relationship; perfectly harmless if they don’t harm/bribe/abuse the animals they love by pan-philic deviancy.

Thank you for reading my comments.

And so I’m only now regaining the use of my right hand. The actual spot of the ” Bite ” still hurts if I try to take liberties with it.

Kiddies, ‘touched’ by an adult, likely cave in on all sorts of levels. A Dog can, and will, rip ye one. Please drop this ” Dogs can’t consent ” shit. I have a Dog here I Guarantee ye won’t get in the same room with, let alone mess with. Few, actually. They just won’t ” Consent ” to ye presence.