Man Forces Boy to Watch Dog Sex
“A Colorado man faces charges of having sex with a dog and forcing a 7-year-old boy to watch. Jason Lee McRoberts, 30, of Castle Rock faces a felony charge of obscenity. He was released Thursday after posting $1,000 bond. No phone number could be found for McRoberts, and he had no attorney listed in court records. Police say the alleged incident occurred between December 2007 and June 2008 when McRoberts lived in Grand Junction, 190 miles west of Denver. Authorities say he has since moved to Castle Rock, 20 miles south of Denver. An arrest warrant affidavit said the 7-year-old boy’s mother told police about the alleged incident. Mesa County’s District Attorney Pete Hautzinger told The Daily Sentinel in Grand Junction that it’s not clear whether McRoberts will face any child-abuse counts. Prosecutors did not immediately return a call to The Associated Press Friday.” — Denver Post (US)
(Thanks to Furpo for the link.)
Here is a picture of Mr. McRoberts. With those prominent cheekbones and chocolate brown eyes, he might be attractive to many men and women — and, who knows, maybe to many dogs too. He must have thought so. Another news report clarifies that Mr. McRoberts had sex with a male dog named JoJo in the bedroom of a home that he shared with the boy whom he wanted to mentor in animal sex. Evidently the boy was a good student, because the whole story came to light when his mother caught the seven-year-old practicing his lessons on the family mutt. She must have screamed something like, “Oh my God! What are you doing to JoJo?!” And the boy must have replied, “Just what Jason taught me. It feels good, ma!”
Bestiality, exhibitionism, pedophilia, a sprinkling of homosexuality (male violator, male kid, male dog) — when you apply the clinical terms to the whole thing, it gives you the feeling that it’s all explained. “Why, of course, Mr. McRoberts simply shows an unusual amalgamation of perversions that are, individually, relatively common.” But then when you take the terms away again, you’re left with an act that defies easy explanation. It’s one thing to boff a family dog. It’s another thing to think you’re a good guy for teaching a seven-year-old how to do it. What was Mr. McRoberts thinking? Was this one of those pot-addled things that seemed like a good idea at the time? Did the boy surprise him with his wee-wee in JoJo and, in his embarrassment, did he try to transform the whole thing into an educational experience? (”I don’t really like dog sex myself. I’m just trying to show you how it’s done — in case you like it.”) Had someone show him when he was just a lad? Probably no one will ever know, and JoJo may well be wondering the same things himself.
This guy is insane, dog boffing is something you do in private and away from loud mouths. Sex should never be taught to anyone unless they ask about it and are over the legal age to get fucked. Dogs make good cockwarmers I am sure but this was just plain stupid. Now he is going to jail to get boffed.
once you go dog, you don’t go back… ;)
Once you go horse, you get arrested by Inspector Morse….:)
gross, just sick….animals and children can’t give consent, so this is both a rape of a dog and the stealing a this boys childhood, and the dog is male so it’s gay rape too.
i hope this man burns.
There are no females centrally involved in this story, so I find it completely uninteresting.
LoL Krovas, it was so uninteresting, but you had to post a comment just to let us all know. Haha.
ladycara: really? that the act was homosexual bothers you? You don’t strike me as the sort — none of the regulars here seem to even take that sort of thing into account. and there wasn’t any rape involved; nothing physical, anyway.
gay does no bother me, i’ve done a little lesbian myself, but as i said the dog was male, and the dog can’t give consent so i said it was rape of the ale on male sort.
he fucked the dog in front of a 7 yr old boy, so in my opinion he raped the dog and exposed a child to bestiality to top it off, that would scar my mind i can only wonder what it has done to the poor child.
” Lady ” Cara; Forgive me but … about twenty four hours ago one of my own, real, live, not figments of a cyber existent imagination, Dogs caught me one across the ‘wrist’ bone. Quite by accident. He just banged a carnasial ” Fang ” onto my wrist. We were playing and he inadvertently made a light contact.
And so I’m only now regaining the use of my right hand. The actual spot of the ” Bite ” still hurts if I try to take liberties with it.
Kiddies, ‘touched’ by an adult, likely cave in on all sorts of levels. A Dog can, and will, rip ye one. Please drop this ” Dogs can’t consent ” shit. I have a Dog here I Guarantee ye won’t get in the same room with, let alone mess with. Few, actually. They just won’t ” Consent ” to ye presence.
oh ouch husk, i’m big on animal rights but hey, what ever rocks your boat.
oh by the way for the last time i’m a female not some gender confused guy so stop making comments on me not being a woman, if supervert allowed email addresses i’d post mine so i could get you to take a good look at my social net work profile, you would be eating your words then.
Dear LadyCara,
I’ve studied a lot in the consensual field of zoosexuality.
Husk is correct, dogs have a tendency to rip anyone apart, if they want to; even when loyalty is present, they don’t put up with something like that, unless they like it; if they like it, there’s nothing wrong.
The only time a dog won’t consent, but submits to its ‘offender’ ‘bestialist’ ‘owner’, is when it is beaten into accepting what he/she doesn’t want; and then sadism has taken place, and sadism is animal cruelty, fair and square, that’s bad, and should be illegal; the animal was made to suffer to succumb to his dastardly deeds.
If he beat the dog into accepting sexual intrusion, he is being cruel to his dog, and hence, for the dogs physical and psychological safety, should have been taken to another home.
If he’s a bestialist (takes hold of the animal, without consent), he’s at his own risk of being bitten, for holding the dog, and ‘penetrating’ it.
Erotic zoophiles, on the other hand, have sex with their dogs with full consent, and don’t hold the dog down, whatsoever, so the dog can freely ‘run away’, and he’d just ‘pop out’; if the dog enjoys it (highly likely for such an affectionate and hedonistic species); if the dog and the human were in a strongly emotional, lustrious, romantic, and lovingly passionate relationship (like the inventive ‘ideal’ human-human one), the dog and human would have sex to please each other via the use of highly pleasurable affectionate stimulation; this kind of zoosexuality is the most common one, and hidden zoophiles all around the world have this kind of relationship in private.
A zoophilic relationship often starts off with obtaining an animal, getting deeply emotionally involved with it, and then getting so deeply affectionate, the highest way of pleasing each other is reached, ‘making love’, yes not ‘taking advantage’.
I’ve investigated the lives of zoophiles, and most of them are just like any other human, it wasn’t out of desperation or illness, or anything, it was ‘orientative’, because they had an attraction ‘romantically’ and/or ’sexually’ towards such a species, that they preferred, above all.
There’s the xenophilic zoophiles, who chose ‘zoophilia’ just to be different to others, or ’special’, because socially, they had low self-esteem, and wanted that little boost in life; a lot of these inhibit true zoophilia, and are harmless if they keep to zoophilic standards.
And there’s also the true zoophiles, who ‘accidentally’ became erotic zoophiles, by having a direct bond with the animal, that grew (like I described earlier in the article), from affection to a full-blown relationship; perfectly harmless if they don’t harm/bribe/abuse the animals they love by pan-philic deviancy.
Thank you for reading my comments.
All comments become the property of PervScan. You must use an email address to post a comment. However, PervScan disallows email addresses in the text of comments.
Vag Vids