The reason why it is bad, is because, even if a remote zoophilic relationship exists, the sheep would feel bewildered as to who just perhaps ‘violently’ and/or ‘desperately’ had sex with them; and if it liked the sex, would wonder why they couldn’t have the same sex again, when they felt, but the human isn’t present and/or won’t be present again (one-time sheep rapist).

But on more harder grounds, it was highly likely the sheep was held down, because most sheep ‘run away’ – hence it was rape, fair and square; but the trespass charge should suit fit beyond all standards, besides. It is clearly wrong, and bad.

Basically, it fails at the first ‘moral’ step of the anti-zoo ladder, ‘not in my backyard’.

These kinds of people, put down the whole of zoosexuality, zoophilia included, because they are the only ones who show it to the public, because they did it in an open field, clearly; whereas zoophiles, do it where they are not exposed, for fears socially, even when laws aren’t present.

Fence-Hoppers must have something wrong with them to be so desperate, though, it seems to have its own categories, ranging from: – mental illness, desperation, deviation, pan-philia, fantasy, etc.

Thank you for reading my comments.

Animal abuse of any kind just drives me bonkers. We’re supposed to be the caretakers! Jezuz Chrizt! Didn’t anybody every hear about just jacking off???

Memories of Kenneth Pinyan.

Twin convicted in third trial on rape charge

http://tinyurl.com/lywnn

Thats so fucking awesome.