Dogs Trained For Bestiality Get Reprieve
“The nation’s largest animal sanctuary has agreed to accept two dogs that authorities say were trained to have sex with women. A mixed breed and a Labrador, formerly owned by Diane Sue Whalen of Tulsa County, have been accepted by the Best Friends Animal Society in Kanab, Utah, said Barbara Williamson, spokeswoman for the animal sanctuary. The dogs — named Lucky and Buddy — will be taken to the no-kill sanctuary next month. Whalen, 54, and Donald Roy Seigfried, 55, were charged with felony crimes against nature after Whalen’s adult son found more than 150 tapes of his mother performing sex acts with her dogs and a blue heeler owned by Seigfried. Seigfried was accused of filming the acts. The dogs were placed in the Tulsa Animal Shelter following the arrests. While Whalen relinquished custody of her dogs, Seigfried is fighting for ownership of the blue heeler, named Merlin. Earlier this month, a judge ordered that the dogs be examined by a veterinarian and found suitable for adoption before being placed in homes. Both of Whalen’s dogs have been deemed adoptable. The dogs were neutered at a Tulsa veterinary clinic. Jamee Suarez, president and founder of the Oklahoma Alliance for Animals, said the dogs are healthy and are recovering from their surgeries… A deputy who investigated the case had recommended that the dogs be euthanized and wrote in court affidavits that they had been trained to rape.” — CBS News (US)
(Thanks to “Chris Finch” for the link.)
Here is a picture of one of the dogs. Here is the mom. None of the articles about this incident specify whether the videos were for personal use or were being distributed somehow. Anyone recognize the lady from a bestiality video?
The spokesperson for the animal sanctuary claimed that the dogs were “totally victims.” Victims? Because they were trained to do something that gave them pleasure? Is that any worse than being trained to hunt fox or chase pheasants out of brush? Hm, well, that’s a philosophical conundrum. But there is definitely a more pronounced victim in this case — the son. Imagine stumbling across a huge cache of videos that show your mom fucking dogs. It can’t be pleasant, unless you happen to harbor both incestuous and zoophiliac inclinations.
Here’s another philosophical conundrum. Suppose you were to discover a bunch of videos showing dogs shtupping your mother. What’s the right thing to do? Report it to the police? Speak to your mother about it? Get her psychological help? Get yourself pyschological help? Both? Ignore the whole thing and try to blot it out of your mind? Ask to join in the fun? This lady’s son chose to go to the cops. What’s that say about him? Blood may be thicker than water, but evidently it’s not thicker than dog cum mixed with mom’s saliva.
Hahaha, this story is all kinds of filthy and I love it.
It’s only good manners to approach the mother before proceeding to the police.
Jeez, Vert. Was that line really necessary?
(Of course, I meant the last line).
I would of gone straight to the FBI…cybertipline at https://tips.fbi.gov and http://www.cybertipline.com to report her, had it been my mother.
Maybe the government needs a secure anonymous animal abuse reporting facility?
What a pity that Buddy and Lucky got neutered. Poor doggies…now Lucky will never get lucky with a new mistress, and Buddy will never become a fuck-buddy for his new owner.
At least they still have their talented canine tongues, and chances are good that they will try to use them on their new owners. ;)
1. The Deputy’s a prick with fundamental hang ups. ” Trained to Rape.” ? FFS. They were shown and encouraged that it was ok to do what most Dogs will do naturally, if Allowed. Fuck anything with a pulse.
2. The Dogs have been ” Neutered “. (” Fixed “. ” Altered “. Rendered no longer ” In Tact “.) No. They have had their testicles torn out. Castrated. It’s Not a ‘Simple Snip’ procedure. It IS ‘Castration’. Why can’t it’s Petaphile advocates just stick to plain language?
3. How long did that son take, watching how many hours of video, before calling in the cops?
4. Who in hell would want to see That woman, period? Let alone, god forbid, naked and having sex. Want Dog on girl shit? Gorgeous young Eastern Europeans are the ‘film stars’. Not hags.
5. Had I discovered such films? If the Dog wasn’t being coerced ~ as I Have seen in commercially produced shit of this nature ~ I’d mind my own fucking business.
I think that ’son’ needs investigating and profiling, more than anyone else in this whole ‘Victimless “Crime”‘.
Seriously I don’t see a crime here other than neutering the dogs.The woman wanted some sex and the dogs had dicks so they fucked and she taped it, IN THE PRIVACY OF HER OWN DAMN HOME. Now what kills me is that they neutered the dogs, if they thought the dogs were really some victims then shouldn’t they have spayed the woman. Sex is natural and people should be able to have what ever type of none hurtful sex they want to in there own home.
If some guy wants to fuck a balloon then let him, A girl wants to fuck a dog then let her, long as we don’t have to see it in public and it doesn’t hurt anyone who really gives a fuck. if your paying almost 2grand a year for an animal then you should get some kinda payback. (Is laughing his ass off right now.) Regardless this isn’t a crime sure its kinda nasty for normies but think about it like this, dogs hump people all the time if they were victims then why chop off those nuts or remove those ovaries?
Well that is my word for this article.
wow that’s a good story, but if it was my mum doing that stuff i wouldn’t report her to the cops, i would just not be able to be around her anymore without cringing, most likely i would just stop having anything to do with her, she’s a grown woman so i can’t tell her how to live her life but i don’t have to be there to watch it and approve.
thank goodness i know my mum not into animals her tastes run more to the conventional, things like corsets and black men that’s what she likes and thank god.
Never – EVER – snoop on your parents sex lives. The son is a asshole who should have minded his own business.
i only know what my mum likes cause shes married now to a black man and she took me shopping to a corset store to help her pick one out as a suprise for my step father, i would never ever snoop on my mums sex life, thats her concern not mine.
I agree with you Husk and Hateful Lovefill panda cakes.
There’s more involved than that, this woman just ‘used’ these dogs for sex, she didn’t love them (the whole concept of polgamy and animal sex exploitation shows this), hence it was mild ‘rape’, ‘coerced’ or not.
Yes, we know rape (according to Wiktionary), means: “The act of forcing sexual intercourse or other sexual activity upon another person, without their consent and/or against their will.”
But the act of forcing somebody to have sex with you can be ‘coercion’ and/or ‘repelled excitement’ (fun rape (see Chremastistophilia and consensual Biastophilia)).
I do believe, in this case, the dogs were being coerced into sexual submission; both in the case of coercion or not, is ‘bestiality’ (zoosexual rape); because she had no real relationship with the animal (that indicates possible coercion), and she sexually exploited them in videos (which a dog can’t consent to, clearly (whereas they can show consent to sex, by body language)).
But in the end of the day, remind me, did these dogs consent to having their testicles being completely taking out; I mean how sick is that?
If you had just had sex with someone (rape or not), and were caught, would you want someone to ‘cut your testicles out’?
There goes a borderline where these ‘animal moralists’ get so far, before they start ‘causing definite harm by emasculation and maladjustment to a new home, in the prevention of potential pleasure’.
Why is it becoming ‘mandatory’ to wipe out the dog race by ‘castration’?
They say (who ever ‘they’ are), we must castrate ‘dogs’ to make them ‘healthier’ and ‘live longer’; however, castration has much more lethal cons, than pros.
You can’t tell off the record, either, because well looked after, uncastrated dogs have always been a minority.
Basically, all you’re doing is preventing ‘puppies’; and yet, IT IS the owner’s responsibility to prevent this.
I’ve known people who worked with intact dogs, and yet they were so good with ‘territory’, never ever, did they intervene, sexually with different ‘packs’; but in the same ‘pack’, the ‘mutts’, tended to have sex with other, but yet, it is still capable of prevention.
Ever heard of ‘condoms’ and ‘contraceptives’, for ‘dogs’? How come humans can party all night, drink, and have drugs, and produce unwanted babies by the bucketload? Yet they can buy precautions; but barely none exist for ‘dogs’?
Despite that, it is the owners’ ultimate responsibility to prevent ‘unwanted’ puppies; it is harder for cats, especially ‘outdoor cats’; and feline STDs are common in the dirty back-alley environments they love to copulate and eat in.
Just check the ‘negative’ side effects for neutering and castrating male dogs…
• if done before 1 year of age, significantly increases the risk of osteosarcoma (bone cancer); this is a
common cancer in medium/large and larger breeds with a poor prognosis.
• increases the risk of cardiac hemangiosarcoma by a factor of 1.6
• triples the risk of hypothyroidism
• increases the risk of progressive geriatric cognitive impairment
• triples the risk of obesity, a common health problem in dogs with many associated health problems
• quadruples the small risk (
probably
To read more of my comments (because of WP Error), follow this link…
http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=484049877&blogId=501798882
All comments become the property of PervScan. You must use an email address to post a comment. However, PervScan disallows email addresses in the text of comments.
Barely Legal