Even when against their will, they often seem to enjoy it, because it is purely pleasure.

But still, consent is best.

Rape should be made wrong for any species orientation.

Dogs extremely hedonistic once sexually mature, both emotionally and physically.

They don’t care if they’re raped or not, for as long as they aren’t harmed, and don’t rebel, it is a sign they don’t mind; and it is pleasure, not harm, anyway.

Human females are scared of getting raped because they don’t want to have unwanted babies, especially by (possibly STD infected), rapists; and most certainly don’t want to add rapist DNA to the gene pool, etc.

Why not castrate human females, too?

They castrated the victim ‘dogs’ according to the “Dogs Trained For Bestiality Get Reprieve” article, here, on PervScan.

Why not castrate all victims?

Either way, I am disgusted by rape, personally; I believe that (erotic) zoophilia is the only form of zoosexuality that should be allowed by carnal knowledge, ever.

I don’t support it; but you must understand both brutal and non-brutal coercion is common in the wild; and whether it be desperation or not, all they thrive is sexual pleasure by spreading their seed, that’s all.

‘Animals don’t consent to sodomy!’ That’s wrong, homosexual sodomy is common in the wild.

Clearly he has an age-orientation towards pre-pubescents.

But the underage can’t consent, aren’t emotional or physically mature, so they are most likely to be harmed by even non-brutal rape / sex.

He found a Bulldog, but couldn’t find a child, so he used the Bulldog for masturbation.

Yes, you heard it ‘an underage Bulldog’; hence he is purely a pederast, as well as a pedophile.

This is what a normal true zoophile (who has sex with dogs) looks like:
#Rapist = No.
#In love = Yes.
#Gender = [Varied].
#Age-Orientation = 21+ (Dog/Solar-Sevenths Years) (3+ (Human/Solar Years)).
#Species-Orientation = Dog (Whatever Breed Current Lover Is).
#Gender-Orientation = [Varied].

He looks like:
#Rapist = Yes?
#In love = No?
#Gender = Male.
#Age-Orientation = -18 (Human/Solar Years).
#Species-Orientation = Any?
#Gender-Orientation = Homosexual?

See what I mean?

Thanks for reading my comments.

If a horny male dog eagerly mounts you, then he is most certainly giving consent. To assert that an animal cannot give consent is illogical. Yes, I know you mean consent in its legal definition, but let’s get real. If a dog willingly engages in sex with a willing human, this is not rape.

Husk- Let me clarify, Dogs cannot give consent to sexual trysts with humans.

‘I’m from the school of thought that children and animals are not something to be *ahem* “dipped into” because they cannot be conseual partners in acts of a sexual nature.’ (sic)

When I was a child, we had a Bitch who was in season. As a result of daily, normal contact with her I ended up with a Dog in the street trying its utmost to deliver me the full package. I just figured this was one friendly Dog who was acting a little weird.

What would your ” School of Thought ” have made of the Dog, had it managed to do what it had in mind?

I’m from the school of thought that children and animals are not something to be *ahem* “dipped into” because they cannot be conseual partners in acts of a sexual nature.

…Necrophilia, however. Victimless crime.
It’s almost like sex with an inanimate object.
(Key word: almost.)

yep i had to go there.ha ha…