Accused Of Using Bulldog To Masturbate
“A Sacramento man was in jail Tuesday after he was caught allegedly sexually assaulting a dog. Sacramento Police were called … after a woman allegedly caught her brother using her five-month-old bulldog, ‘Chateau,’ to masturbate, said Konrad Von Schoech, Sacramento Police. The woman made a citizen’s arrest against her brother and called police. The suspect, Kelly Pecor, now faces the charge of sexual assault on an animal. Pecor is a registered sex offender.” — CBS5 (US)
Here is a picture of Mr. Pecor. (Does his name rhyme with pecker?) He looks like one of those guys whose beard forms a single carpet of hair with his chest. He could use a visit to the prison barber. It may even be a reunion between the barber and him, since Mr. Pecor has been in trouble before. You can find him on the California sex offender registry. His previous offense was to “annoy/molest children.”
It would be interesting to hear the sister’s side of the story as well. What motivated her to rat on her brother? Was this the first time she caught him with “Chateau?” Had she been discovering globs of semen on the dog’s fur? Did she try to discourage her brother on previous occasions — “Now Kelly, you better leave Chateau alone or else…” — or did she dial 911 the moment she saw her brother fondling her dog? Does she prefer her pet to her own brother? How ironic that would be — the sister harboring a sort of spiritual bestiality, a love for her dog, that causes her to censure the sexual bestiality of her brother…
And here is a philosophical question. If a man ceases to molest children and turns his attention toward animals, does that represent an improvement in his sexual pathology? It surely must be less immoral to masturbate with a bulldog than to abuse a child. On the other hand, might switching from children to dogs represent a worsening of the man’s sexual pathology? After all, to fuck an animal is to take one step further away from your fellow man. It’s less humane to abuse a child, but somehow it’s less human to masturbate with a dog. Where does that leave you — outside humanity? Inside monstrosity?
It leaves you a dog fucker either way!
now this guy is just sick…he likes under aged no matter what the species is…send him to prison now before he self pleasures himself with a 5 month old baby human.
I read the headline as “Accused Of Using Building To Masturbate”, and expected some kind of architecture fetish. We’ve done that, right?
yes james…we’ve all done that… ;)
and uh wait this guy doesn’t live in seattle ??? wow… ;)
Another possibility:
Maybe his sister was motivated by jealousy. Maybe she was outraged that her brother was doing to her beloved dog what she was regularly doing to her dog.
LoL, I sent the article to the California Attorney General, Megans’ Law And Sex Offender Divisions. I can imagine sexy corrections officers laughing themselves to death right about now.
Chicks fucking dogs is kewl, guys fucking dogs is….ewwww.
well krovas…that …was interesting… ;)
is that sort of like guys saying lesbians are cool/but gay males aren’t… ;)
kathy..maybe she was upset her brother wasn’t doing it to her. ;)
yep i had to go there.ha ha…
Only hot lezzies are kewl =D
oh… ;)
As the owner of a bulldog and a big advocate of animal rights…
This really upset me.
I’m from the school of thought that children and animals are not something to be *ahem* “dipped into” because they cannot be conseual partners in acts of a sexual nature.
…Necrophilia, however. Victimless crime.
It’s almost like sex with an inanimate object.
(Key word: almost.)
Having sex with a corpse is precisely like having sex with an inanimate object. Not entirely victimless, though, if the relatives ever catch wind of it.
Miss AmAryka said:
‘I’m from the school of thought that children and animals are not something to be *ahem* “dipped into†because they cannot be conseual partners in acts of a sexual nature.’ (sic)
When I was a child, we had a Bitch who was in season. As a result of daily, normal contact with her I ended up with a Dog in the street trying its utmost to deliver me the full package. I just figured this was one friendly Dog who was acting a little weird.
What would your ” School of Thought ” have made of the Dog, had it managed to do what it had in mind?
Krovas – If the relatives do not know, they do not get hurt. :D
Husk- Let me clarify, Dogs cannot give consent to sexual trysts with humans.
Miss America,
If a horny male dog eagerly mounts you, then he is most certainly giving consent. To assert that an animal cannot give consent is illogical. Yes, I know you mean consent in its legal definition, but let’s get real. If a dog willingly engages in sex with a willing human, this is not rape.
I agree with ladycara.
Clearly he has an age-orientation towards pre-pubescents.
But the underage can’t consent, aren’t emotional or physically mature, so they are most likely to be harmed by even non-brutal rape / sex.
He found a Bulldog, but couldn’t find a child, so he used the Bulldog for masturbation.
Yes, you heard it ‘an underage Bulldog’; hence he is purely a pederast, as well as a pedophile.
This is what a normal true zoophile (who has sex with dogs) looks like:
#Rapist = No.
#In love = Yes.
#Gender = [Varied].
#Age-Orientation = 21+ (Dog/Solar-Sevenths Years) (3+ (Human/Solar Years)).
#Species-Orientation = Dog (Whatever Breed Current Lover Is).
#Gender-Orientation = [Varied].
He looks like:
#Rapist = Yes?
#In love = No?
#Gender = Male.
#Age-Orientation = -18 (Human/Solar Years).
#Species-Orientation = Any?
#Gender-Orientation = Homosexual?
See what I mean?
Thanks for reading my comments.
Miss AmAryka, I have no end of evidence in my field that dogs enjoy and consent to sex.
Even when against their will, they often seem to enjoy it, because it is purely pleasure.
But still, consent is best.
Rape should be made wrong for any species orientation.
Dogs extremely hedonistic once sexually mature, both emotionally and physically.
They don’t care if they’re raped or not, for as long as they aren’t harmed, and don’t rebel, it is a sign they don’t mind; and it is pleasure, not harm, anyway.
Human females are scared of getting raped because they don’t want to have unwanted babies, especially by (possibly STD infected), rapists; and most certainly don’t want to add rapist DNA to the gene pool, etc.
Why not castrate human females, too?
They castrated the victim ‘dogs’ according to the “Dogs Trained For Bestiality Get Reprieve” article, here, on PervScan.
Why not castrate all victims?
Either way, I am disgusted by rape, personally; I believe that (erotic) zoophilia is the only form of zoosexuality that should be allowed by carnal knowledge, ever.
I don’t support it; but you must understand both brutal and non-brutal coercion is common in the wild; and whether it be desperation or not, all they thrive is sexual pleasure by spreading their seed, that’s all.
‘Animals don’t consent to sodomy!’ That’s wrong, homosexual sodomy is common in the wild.
All comments become the property of PervScan. You must use an email address to post a comment. However, PervScan disallows email addresses in the text of comments.
Camgirls