Baby Born With Penis On Back
“This is the picture that will shock parents around the world — a baby born with a second penis on his back. The tot was born to farmer dad Li Jun, 30, and his unnamed wife, who live in Hejian city in central China’s Henan province. But he was rushed to Tianjin Childrens’ Hospital on May 27 for surgery to remove his extra manhood. The rare condition, the first for Tianjin Childrens’ Hospital, is called fetus in fetu (FIF). Doctors, who spent over three hours removing the extra penis on June 6, said he was fine following surgery.” — The Sun (UK)
Here is the picture of the poor little tyke with his extra penis. While the thing may be unsettling to behold, it raises all sorts of fantastic sexual possibilities. Presuming the penis could get erect — it just needs blood, right? And it must have blood supply or it would atrophy and fall off — it would mean the kid (when he grows up) could fuck people by backing into them. Or he could flash people while running away from them. Or he could ejaculate forwards and backwards at the same time. Given some of the possibilities, it can’t be long before devotees of body modification try to grow themselves a dorsal dick.
Seriously, though, the baby’s strange case of fetus in fetu raises an interesting point about perversion. Why is something like this an abnormality, perhaps even a monstrosity, and not a perversion? What is it that distinguishes the two? And if a body modder did find some way to graft a penis to his spine, would that be perverse? If so, how come it’s not perverse when a baby is born with one and it is perverse when an adult chooses one?
The perverse part to me is removing it; for starters, there’s a lifelong source of income (or do I just read too many freak-show tales?). Perhaps it has evolutionary advantage too, and he could have been a new branch in the species’ development. Regardless, I think I’d be resentful if I had something so amazing removed before I got to make the choice. (Mind you, if I were male, I’d be peeved at being circumcised without being asked, too.)
Maybe they’ll keep it for him as a spare.
” how come it’s not perverse when a baby is born with one and it is perverse when an adult chooses one? ”
Granted, not as clear cut as it at first seems. The beby has the exrea penis as an ‘act of nature’. It’s easy to say he didn’t choose to have it. But then, does a ‘Pervert’ choose to have their perversion?
LOL! Excellent! This question just divides like something out of ” The Thing “! I thought it might be more perverse to *Fancy* the guys back dick. But then the same thing applies; Is fancying it ” Perverse “, or just a quirk of ones born nature?
That’s me fucked up! ‘Night.
:D
poor little baby…
Wow if your going to have a deformity make sure its a cool one like three breasts or two dicks.
Uh! If I was that kid, I would be so incredibly mad!! How many people get the chance to have TWO dicks?!? Thats like… a dream cum true!!!
Since the link to the photo is on The Sun, I not so much shocked as I am skeptical. In short, I think this is phony bologna.
All comments become the property of PervScan. You must use an email address to post a comment. However, PervScan disallows email addresses in the text of comments.
Bukkake