Custom Videos “A New Level Of Depravity”
“Customized videos of kids engaging in sex acts represent a ‘new level of depravity,’ according to the head of a national child-advocacy group. ‘You can’t get much sicker than that,’ said Rosalind Prober of the group Beyond Borders. Prober was reacting to news earlier this week that police in Canada had arrested 10 people who allegedly were customers of a website allowing users to request specific sex acts they wanted the children to perform…. But while Prober feels the arrests may deter people in the short term, she doubts the effects will last long. ‘The crime is just too easy to commit,’ she said, noting that improvements to Internet capabilities on wireless devices are making child porn even more accessible. When technical advances become available, ‘there’s no thought as to the impact on children whatsoever,’ said Prober. She added she also worries about legal websites that can sometimes become so-called gateways to predatory behaviour. Of particular concern is a site called Second Life, which allows people to act out their fantasies using computer-generated characters. According to news reports, the site has been linked to cases of virtual child pornography in which users pay to have sex with people posing as kids. ‘The idea that it all stops with fantasy, I don’t buy into that,’ Prober said.” — The Peterborough Examiner (Canada)
There have been “regular human” (as a friend put it) sites offering customize-your-porn functionality for quite a while now. Doubtless it also exists in every corner of the porn underworld. Pornography of whatever sort has consistently been on the cutting edge of information technology, so it should come as no surprise that illegal forms of pornography continue to blaze trails. Every technology trend has its illicit mirror. Like Facebook? There is probably a social networking site for pedos. Like Digg? There is probably a clone for bestialists (Pigg?).
It is difficult to imagine authorities ever finding a technology solution to the proliferation of illegal pornography. Pornographers tend to innovate while law enforcers play catch-up, image recognition programs would return too many false positives, and there is simply too much net traffic to surveil everyone anyway. And this is not to mention the brute fact that there will always be people who find illegal desiderata — corpses, animals, children — highly stimulating.
It half makes you wonder if authorities shouldn’t resort to absurd measures. In the case of these customize-your-kiddie-porn sites, maybe infiltrators could buy memberships and then keep the site busy with requests for the kids to do normal things — play with train sets and dolls, roast marshmallows over a fire, ride bicycles in a park. In this way, the children would at least be spared a few hours of sodomy. The pornographers, meanwhile, would be elated that their business was booming and would go on a desperate search for more children. Perhaps this would cause them to become reckless and bold. They’d tip their hands, SWAT teams would rush in and arrest them, and then the children would be left with some weird psychological complex in which they associate the most seemingly normal acts with being exploited.
Well, okay, that’s a terrible idea. Now you know why PervScan does not work for law enforcement. But desperate times call for desperate measures, and it is difficult to see how authorities could ever slam the lid on the Pandora’s Box that is child pornography.
…..”They’d tip their hands, SWAT teams would rush in and arrest them, and then the children would be left with some weird psychological complex in which they associate the most seemingly normal acts with being exploited.”
OMG! that was so funny, you made milk come out of my nose!
(the story is frightning though, you wonder just how many ‘nonces’ there are out there? Surely, the police can find out the ip addresses of the place the video is being broadcast from and then go and catch them? they should hire some ‘1337′ hackers and pay them to get into these sites and get all the info from their databases!
Also once they get the bank details of the perverts who pay for the kiddy porn, they should arrest them and put them away for the same amount of time as the people commiting the act! So if a perv watchs a man rape a child then they should get the same sentence as a child rapist! (Or i’m i being to extreamist?)
I’ve noticed a trend in pedoporn lately myself, ie that most of the producers are in the eastern bloc countries, safely out of reach of Western law enforcement. That’s been a long standing difficulty in fighting the production of any sort of kiddie stuff. I’m sure the custom production companies are the same.
Couple that with the fact that the big money from pedoporn is coming from counttries like Japan, with it’s Lolita fixation and softcore kiddie sets that are widely available, and the Middle East, where a 13 year old bride is still the norm for that oil billionaire member of the royal family, and it becomes obvious why it’s been so hard to stop this stuff. Try as we might we will NEVER get the mafia type organization that is the current Russian govenrment to enforce Western laws regarding kiddie porn as long as the money rolls in.
So, we either adopt Draconian measures ala China to suppress internet freedom, or we accept that we can’t completely stop pedophiles and continue to fight it any way we can. At least that’s my best guess.
I can remember when I first heard of the internet at home. I think it was 1992 or 1993, and the BBC News report told uk society how much our lives would change with the use of internet in everyday people’s homes. A lot of people laughed at the news report as junk science or stuff for 100 years in the future. Nobody saw a need for it back then, at least not the average middle class family.
Looking back nearly 15 years, it seems almost incredulous that the welfare of children, and the vulnerable in society was not the top priority. The scientists were so busy getting the internet up and running, functioning correctly and fixing problems, they probably didn’t even think of porn or child porn being available one day.
Here is the crucial question: Has the internet caused a rise in real world child abuse?
Some people believe that it has, as it makes child porn so easily accessible to anyone with that wraped mindset.
Other people believe pedophilia was a “behind closed doors” affair until the availability of the internet at home for the average joe, and that if anything, the internet has just served to highlight just how high a percentage of our population is truly sick, mentally deranged, sadistic, and cruel.
There is no doubt some pedophiles have been created by the internet, but how high a proportion.
I guess at least law enforcement have something to work with on the internet. It’s much easier to catch a guy downloading child porn on LimeWire than it is to catch a 50yr old uncle abusing his 12 yr old niece in his bedroom. In real world abuse, the child must come forward, or a relative must display concern and report it to the authorities. How many real world pedos suddenly just hand themself in to police?
At least online their is some trail of activity.
Well, yeah… But by the same standards the ancient Chinese priests who scratched the first semiotic symbols onto pieces of bone should have been thinking “hmmm… one day someone might use these little doodads to write naughty stories about their kiddy fiddling techniques… on the whole, lads, I think we’d better keep this writing business under wraps”. Ditto for the invention of tv, and don’t even talk to me about realistic figurative drawing…
All comments become the property of PervScan. You must use an email address to post a comment. However, PervScan disallows email addresses in the text of comments.

