<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ranking the Perversions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pervscan.com/2007/10/10/ranking-the-perversions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pervscan.com/2007/10/10/ranking-the-perversions/</link>
	<description>An Index to the Sordid and Depraved</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:18:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: vortex ethereal</title>
		<link>http://pervscan.com/2007/10/10/ranking-the-perversions/comment-page-1/#comment-27569</link>
		<dc:creator>vortex ethereal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 22:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pervscan.com/2007/10/10/ranking-the-perversions/#comment-27569</guid>
		<description>Curiously, babies will eat their excrement and small children are uniformly fascinated with dead animals. My daughter and her friends once repeatedly dug up a dead turtle to play funereal. So obsessed were they that the poor turtle had to be secretly buried elsewhere. What conclusions can be drawn? Are perversions perhaps normative in some primal sense? Could social conditioning be the most serious perversion of all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curiously, babies will eat their excrement and small children are uniformly fascinated with dead animals. My daughter and her friends once repeatedly dug up a dead turtle to play funereal. So obsessed were they that the poor turtle had to be secretly buried elsewhere. What conclusions can be drawn? Are perversions perhaps normative in some primal sense? Could social conditioning be the most serious perversion of all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vortex ethereal</title>
		<link>http://pervscan.com/2007/10/10/ranking-the-perversions/comment-page-1/#comment-27568</link>
		<dc:creator>vortex ethereal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 22:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pervscan.com/2007/10/10/ranking-the-perversions/#comment-27568</guid>
		<description>Pedophilia is pretty much main stream as far as I can see. I agree that it is reprehensible because of the violation of trust but children are beautiful. Just look how the torture of innocence dominates pop culture. Of course pop surrealism explores most perversions simultaneously in the visual arts. Innocence and morbidity, the fascination is undeniable and perhaps even understandable. We can all identify with both tormented and tormentor. Eating feces however...now, how can that be fun?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pedophilia is pretty much main stream as far as I can see. I agree that it is reprehensible because of the violation of trust but children are beautiful. Just look how the torture of innocence dominates pop culture. Of course pop surrealism explores most perversions simultaneously in the visual arts. Innocence and morbidity, the fascination is undeniable and perhaps even understandable. We can all identify with both tormented and tormentor. Eating feces however&#8230;now, how can that be fun?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curiousBBW</title>
		<link>http://pervscan.com/2007/10/10/ranking-the-perversions/comment-page-1/#comment-27222</link>
		<dc:creator>curiousBBW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pervscan.com/2007/10/10/ranking-the-perversions/#comment-27222</guid>
		<description>My only &quot;problem&quot; is with the use of the word &quot;Fetishism&quot; as a catch-all term.  IMO, all these things ARE fetishes.  So if you mean &quot;Fetishism&quot; to be &quot;everything else&quot; than that&#039;s problematic IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My only &#8220;problem&#8221; is with the use of the word &#8220;Fetishism&#8221; as a catch-all term.  IMO, all these things ARE fetishes.  So if you mean &#8220;Fetishism&#8221; to be &#8220;everything else&#8221; than that&#8217;s problematic IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mocha B</title>
		<link>http://pervscan.com/2007/10/10/ranking-the-perversions/comment-page-1/#comment-27079</link>
		<dc:creator>Mocha B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 01:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pervscan.com/2007/10/10/ranking-the-perversions/#comment-27079</guid>
		<description>I love this conversation.  Thanks, Supervert!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this conversation.  Thanks, Supervert!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Secondhand Rose</title>
		<link>http://pervscan.com/2007/10/10/ranking-the-perversions/comment-page-1/#comment-27058</link>
		<dc:creator>Secondhand Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pervscan.com/2007/10/10/ranking-the-perversions/#comment-27058</guid>
		<description>I cannot vote because I cannot break the tie for most offensive -- I am torn between Bestiality and Pedophilia.  Both are offensive because they are living sentient creatures who cannot consent and cannot refuse.  Both, therefore, are rape.  I look forward to the results. I think. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot vote because I cannot break the tie for most offensive &#8212; I am torn between Bestiality and Pedophilia.  Both are offensive because they are living sentient creatures who cannot consent and cannot refuse.  Both, therefore, are rape.  I look forward to the results. I think. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neko</title>
		<link>http://pervscan.com/2007/10/10/ranking-the-perversions/comment-page-1/#comment-27019</link>
		<dc:creator>Neko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 07:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pervscan.com/2007/10/10/ranking-the-perversions/#comment-27019</guid>
		<description>Since no one else is volunteering for the school experiment I&#039;ll bring a cadaver if someone else provides the shit.

Requiescat in pace etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since no one else is volunteering for the school experiment I&#8217;ll bring a cadaver if someone else provides the shit.</p>
<p>Requiescat in pace etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://pervscan.com/2007/10/10/ranking-the-perversions/comment-page-1/#comment-27015</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 13:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pervscan.com/2007/10/10/ranking-the-perversions/#comment-27015</guid>
		<description>Necrophilia is in the lead as most perverse?! Madness. Then again, this was a hard poll...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Necrophilia is in the lead as most perverse?! Madness. Then again, this was a hard poll&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supervert</title>
		<link>http://pervscan.com/2007/10/10/ranking-the-perversions/comment-page-1/#comment-27013</link>
		<dc:creator>Supervert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pervscan.com/2007/10/10/ranking-the-perversions/#comment-27013</guid>
		<description>&quot;Would not more children be repelled by the presence of a dead person? Would they play with a corpse, dâ€™ye think?&quot; Plainly an experiment is in order. Somebody round up some cadavers to leave in the playground...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Would not more children be repelled by the presence of a dead person? Would they play with a corpse, dâ€™ye think?&#8221; Plainly an experiment is in order. Somebody round up some cadavers to leave in the playground&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Husk</title>
		<link>http://pervscan.com/2007/10/10/ranking-the-perversions/comment-page-1/#comment-27008</link>
		<dc:creator>Husk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 05:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pervscan.com/2007/10/10/ranking-the-perversions/#comment-27008</guid>
		<description>Fuge: &quot; (Ideally this debate would involve face-to-face time with other perverts and easy access to alcohol!) &quot;

 That cracked me up! :D Funny enough, Fuge; I normally only get to come back here towards the end of my &#039;evenings&#039;. So I&#039;ve usually accessed a fair bit of alcohol by now myself! ;-)

 Me / &#039;Vert: &quot; â€œI mean, dead people and shit? Are there any other two things in the universe we instinctively withdraw from like we do from those?â€ So you think the perversity of an act is proportional to the â€œinnateâ€ repugnance people feel toward shit and death? And yet, isnâ€™t that repugnance socially conditioned as well? Children will play with their own excrement. &quot;

 Would not more children be repelled by the presence of a dead person? Would they play with a corpse, d&#039;ye think?

 Maybe my own angle is derived not so much from &#039;socially conditioned repugnance&#039; as just plain understanding. Eg. I&#039;ve just this minute come from a forum where it was showing a media report of how a load of hospital patients had died of a specifically shit borne disease, contracted on the wards. 

 Shit can be dangerous. So can snakes and loaded guns and berries. We have to teach our children these things. If ye want to call that &#039;social conditioning&#039;? That&#039;s fine. But it still stands, doesn&#039;t it?

 Dead people? I have to admit; The above (my) criteria doesn&#039;t fit so well there, does it? A dead paedophile is a lot less danger to a child than a live one. And I say that on the given that no one, in discussing Necrophillia, would be thinking of a well rotted corpse.

 Embrace my naked body now? No harm. If I drop dead now and ye embrace my dead, naked body tomorrow night? Again, no harm, I&#039;d have thought. But, by the time I started blowing up and splitting? Ah, jesus ....!

 Interestingly; One of my Dogs died the other week. As I laid him into the ground, just hours later, no way could I bring myself to kiss his face goodbye. He was stiff and cold. A corpse. No longer the warm and responsive creature I&#039;d unhesitatingly plant a kiss on the day before.

 No one&#039;s ever &quot;conditioned &quot; me for that. I just *Instinctively* recognised that this was dead and decomposing meat. Other animals too recognise death in their friends. Though, conversely, they&#039;ll happily eat that friend once the body reaches a certain state of decomposition.

 I recognise that I&#039;m bouncing around a bit here, &#039;Vert. But that&#039;s just due to my own attempting to pin the point down: Kiddies will indeed play with   excrement. They don&#039;t yet recognise the inherrant dangers. Yet DO kiddies play with dead things in the same way?

 Whilst having no personal reccollection of any fasination with shit, I Do remember picking up some dry Dog shit and chasing my mortified friends with it. But I could see it was dry and hard as stone. Not as if it was wet and sticking to my fingers.

 At the same period we found a dead sparrow. I busted it open and we were all fasinated by what was inside it. But mess with what was in there? Hell no! It was dead and we *Instinctively* felt it would be wrong. No way were any us of going to let our own skin touch That lot.

 Damn. Now ye&#039;ve got me so wrapped up in all this, I think I&#039;ll go back to my &#039;home&#039; forum and present this question to a bunch of perfectly average, &#039;normal&#039; people! I just need to figure out what &#039;The Question&#039; is! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuge: &#8221; (Ideally this debate would involve face-to-face time with other perverts and easy access to alcohol!) &#8221;</p>
<p> That cracked me up! :D Funny enough, Fuge; I normally only get to come back here towards the end of my &#8216;evenings&#8217;. So I&#8217;ve usually accessed a fair bit of alcohol by now myself! ;-)</p>
<p> Me / &#8216;Vert: &#8221; â€œI mean, dead people and shit? Are there any other two things in the universe we instinctively withdraw from like we do from those?â€ So you think the perversity of an act is proportional to the â€œinnateâ€ repugnance people feel toward shit and death? And yet, isnâ€™t that repugnance socially conditioned as well? Children will play with their own excrement. &#8221;</p>
<p> Would not more children be repelled by the presence of a dead person? Would they play with a corpse, d&#8217;ye think?</p>
<p> Maybe my own angle is derived not so much from &#8217;socially conditioned repugnance&#8217; as just plain understanding. Eg. I&#8217;ve just this minute come from a forum where it was showing a media report of how a load of hospital patients had died of a specifically shit borne disease, contracted on the wards. </p>
<p> Shit can be dangerous. So can snakes and loaded guns and berries. We have to teach our children these things. If ye want to call that &#8217;social conditioning&#8217;? That&#8217;s fine. But it still stands, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p> Dead people? I have to admit; The above (my) criteria doesn&#8217;t fit so well there, does it? A dead paedophile is a lot less danger to a child than a live one. And I say that on the given that no one, in discussing Necrophillia, would be thinking of a well rotted corpse.</p>
<p> Embrace my naked body now? No harm. If I drop dead now and ye embrace my dead, naked body tomorrow night? Again, no harm, I&#8217;d have thought. But, by the time I started blowing up and splitting? Ah, jesus &#8230;.!</p>
<p> Interestingly; One of my Dogs died the other week. As I laid him into the ground, just hours later, no way could I bring myself to kiss his face goodbye. He was stiff and cold. A corpse. No longer the warm and responsive creature I&#8217;d unhesitatingly plant a kiss on the day before.</p>
<p> No one&#8217;s ever &#8220;conditioned &#8221; me for that. I just *Instinctively* recognised that this was dead and decomposing meat. Other animals too recognise death in their friends. Though, conversely, they&#8217;ll happily eat that friend once the body reaches a certain state of decomposition.</p>
<p> I recognise that I&#8217;m bouncing around a bit here, &#8216;Vert. But that&#8217;s just due to my own attempting to pin the point down: Kiddies will indeed play with   excrement. They don&#8217;t yet recognise the inherrant dangers. Yet DO kiddies play with dead things in the same way?</p>
<p> Whilst having no personal reccollection of any fasination with shit, I Do remember picking up some dry Dog shit and chasing my mortified friends with it. But I could see it was dry and hard as stone. Not as if it was wet and sticking to my fingers.</p>
<p> At the same period we found a dead sparrow. I busted it open and we were all fasinated by what was inside it. But mess with what was in there? Hell no! It was dead and we *Instinctively* felt it would be wrong. No way were any us of going to let our own skin touch That lot.</p>
<p> Damn. Now ye&#8217;ve got me so wrapped up in all this, I think I&#8217;ll go back to my &#8216;home&#8217; forum and present this question to a bunch of perfectly average, &#8216;normal&#8217; people! I just need to figure out what &#8216;The Question&#8217; is! :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://pervscan.com/2007/10/10/ranking-the-perversions/comment-page-1/#comment-27005</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pervscan.com/2007/10/10/ranking-the-perversions/#comment-27005</guid>
		<description>I am going to write an article for you on the relationship between Peeping Tom and serial murder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going to write an article for you on the relationship between Peeping Tom and serial murder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
