Contact PervScan RSS Feed Banners for PervScan
 
PervScan is for adults only. If you are under 18, you must leave now.

$1 Billion “Don’t Have Sex” Campaign A Flop

“It’s been a central plank of George Bush’s social policy: to stop teenagers having sex. More than $1bn of federal money has been spent on promoting abstinence since 1998 — posters printed, television adverts broadcast and entire education programmes devised for hundreds of thousands of girls and boys. The trouble is, new research suggests that it hasn’t worked. At all. A survey of more than 2,000 teenagers carried out by a research company on behalf of Congress found that the half of the sample given abstinence-only education displayed exactly the same predilection for sex as those who had received conventional sex education in which contraception was discussed… In the context of findings like this, health workers and statisticians conclude that it is far better that children have safe sex, with knowledge of and access to contraception, than that they are preached a message of abstinence only to ignore it. Anti-abstinence activists have long argued that the movement is dangerous because it leaves young people exposed to the risk of teen pregnancy and infection because the teaching shuns any mention of condoms or contraception. Of about 19m new STD infections in the US each year, almost half are recorded among people aged 15 to 24.” — Guardian (UK)

The results of this research will surprise no one who reads PervScan. You know only too well that it is absurd to impose a social policy of celibacy on the biological wilds of desire. For every preacher who tells you to wait, a little voice inside — a Darwinian homunculus in your brain — tells you to perpetuate your species, and there’s only one way to do that. Fuck, just like the billions of people who preceded you and hopefully the trillions who will follow you. Fuck. Fuck. It’s as ineluctable as death.

And if you understand that biological reality, it’s hard to stomach the thought of the government spending a billion dollars — of taxpayer money — on propaganda dooomed to fail. It’s like spending a bunch of money on posters that say, “Don’t die!”

If you want to understand the failure of abstinence education beyond the biological reality that it tries to combat, there is an interesting document by the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States. It excerpts some absurdities found in the actual propaganda being given to young people. For example, check out this gem:

Couples who use condoms for birth control experience a first-year failure rate of about 15% in preventing pregnancies. This means that over a period of five years, there could be a 50% chance or higher of getting pregnant with condoms used as the birth control method.

You hope that whoever wrote this was as ignorant of math as he was of sex. It is difficult to believe an “educator” would knowingly use such bad math to make a point. For the record, condoms prevent pregnancy at a rate of 98% — when they’re used correctly, and you could certainly teach young people how to use them for less than a billion dollars. It’s not that hard.

Here is another excerpt:

Men sexually are like microwaves and women sexually are like crockpots… a woman is stimulated more by touch and romantic words. She is far more attracted by a man’s personality while a man is stimulated by sight. A man is usually less discriminating about those to whom he is physically attracted.

A microwave and a crockpot? A man heats up in a minute and a woman takes a day of simmering to get hot? Wow. That’s so ridiculous that the only response it deserves is the one given it by the teens who ignore it.

 
Comments Total: 4
Halene Pabamog
Apr 27 2007
10:34 am

98% per condom? That means that if yuo have sex once a week, there is a 65% chance one of the 52 didn’t stop a pregnancy. Since a woman’s able to get pregnant about four out of the 28 days in her cycle, this means there is a 14% chance that the one condom was enough. So a 9% chance the woman gets pregnant. A condom really isn’t that great.

The great advantage is preventing STDs; the pill is for pregnancies.

Sven
Apr 27 2007
8:25 pm

I’m sure someone around here knows for sure, but I believe that number came from a study that found that, when using condoms correctly and consistently, only about 2% of the participating couples became pregnant. I’m in a hurry or I’d look it up for you, but that is, at least, what I remember hearing.

laura
Apr 28 2007
2:05 pm

What really bothers me about abstinence-only campaigns is that they treat sex as something Incredibly Bad. They try and tell kids that if you have sex, and no unwanted pregnancies occur and no STI’s are transmitted, something Bad has happened that devalues them as a person. The reason abstinence-only campaigns fail is that the kids’ senses tell them, in consensual, loving sex, that something good’s going on; and if you have a teacher who’s spouting propaganda about what bad, sick, stupid people they are for having fun sex, that’s what really makes them feel devalued as people.

And then they don’t know how to protect themselves and their partners; so the shit just piles up.

tunoughts
Oct 22 2009
1:07 am

I know this is two years later, but for some reason I feel the need to point out the fact that 98% is a static number. It doesn’t matter how many different condoms you use in a given week, as long as you use them correctly the chances stay at a solid 98% The 2% is not cumulative. I failed algebra II twice and even I understand that condoms are really good at preventing pregnancy.

Add Comment  
Comment Policy

All comments become the property of PervScan. You must use an email address to post a comment. However, PervScan disallows email addresses in the text of comments.

Required and published
Required but not published