Demon, male dogs hump you when you’re least expecting it, and drop it with the ‘it’s just dominance, shit’, if they penetrate you, and cum in you, it is still ‘dominance’, yeah right, whatever!

Expressive consent (initiation, even without your consent), is beyond both ‘informed’ and ‘implied’ consent.

Females dog will sit on your groin, begging for you, the mate, to have sex with them; even if there’s a perfectly good male dog in the room, you’re their love, not them.

If you don’t hold the female, and you penetrate it, your penis will just ‘plonk’ out, if they don’t really want it. They won’t ’stand their and enjoy it, making ecstastic groans’, they’ll run off, or if they don’t like you, they’ll bite you, too. But dogs are loyal, and extremely affectionate.

Dogs are the kind of creatures that will give you all the pleasure you want, as long as you give that pleasure back. Whereas, in the modern human world, if the male pays the woman, the woman will have sex; whether it be by giving them a nice home, etc, or paid directly for purely sex, like some ho or escort.

Dog owners pay $2,000+ a year, just to keep the animal; and guess how much it costs to keep a girlfriend? Twice as much!

At least a dog will show pure affection, and not be just there for a cosy home, a good life, and lots of cash to go shopping with. They are there for you; a cosy home and a good life is just an extra.

There are some genuine human-human relationships out there, but zoophilic relationships are most likely to be devoted to emotional bonds, where sex is just a way to show how much you love each other, by giving the ultimate ecstasy from it, two-way ’sexual gratification’!

And where coercion, pre-pubescents, mentally ill, and harm is not present, what’s wrong with zoosexuality?

With boundaries showing zoophilia as much more romantic, because of being brave to live such a lifestyle in the abnorm, it goes to show, ‘true zoophiles’ are sweethearts.

I think true zoophiles shows the fairy tale principle of a kind of relationship, humans dare not have in these modern times.

When I was young, love was simple, after the war in Britain, I saw people fall in love because of pure romance, sex with either second, or caused by sexual attraction. They didn’t care about each others’ backgrounds, and ‘making babies’, didn’t come about, until they wanted a family; everything seemed natural, and genuine.

And yet, they call the seemingly only true love nowadays, ‘true zoophilia’ immoral!

And yet bestialists, necro-bestialists, pedo-bestialists, and zoosadists, ruin the idea of being in love with a non-human animal, by being desperately horny and fucking/raping them for self-gratification!

I guess kissing a puppy is wrong, also.
Or kissing a dog who’s just died.

I don’t promote it, but the boundary lines have to go at the seperations, not over the abstracts.

Sex with animals should be allowed, per se, not rape, harm and/or having sex with pre-pubescents!

Get the picture yet?

And while I don’t specifically have a problem with beastiality, can’t you at least wait untill the “animal” in question can say, in no uncertain terms, either “yay” or “nay”?

Demon,