Comments on: Deer Assault Case Presents Unusual Issues

By: Kristen

Kristen — Sun, 04 Dec 2011 04:49:35 +0000

Actually RJ45, I wouldn’t care if someone violated my corpse. I’d be dead, after all. At that point, it’s just decaying flesh – no feeling, no suffering, no moral problem, imho. I had a friend who proclaimed to be a necrophile in high school. I told him he could have sex with my body as much as he wanted after I die. I honestly don’t care. I think people should be able to donate their bodies to pleasure just like they can to science or medicine. If I don’t care what happens to my corpse and someone could gain pleasure from it, why can’t I choose to grant someone that right?

By: Dr James D Smith

Dr James D Smith — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:47:17 +0000

It is necro-bestiality (necrozoophilia doesn’t exist as a neologism to the meaning of ‘zoophilia’, ‘zoophilia’ is not rape, that’s rape, because it is not know be other than non-consensual force on a non-substrated sessile).

Yes, pure love, are you a zoophile or a true zoophile; or can’t you tell/say?

By: pure love

pure love — Wed, 26 Dec 2007 12:51:33 +0000

Love it! the offense against meat comment! No dead meat for me… I love animals with life and thought and yes, choice freedom…I’m not a puppy-lover…my queen bitch is three and very happy to hear the bed word…she’s a more than willing participant in physical love…jealous of any human that dares show sexual interest in me…

By: Husk

Husk — Mon, 04 Dec 2006 05:08:03 +0000

I’m with ” Puppylover ” there ~ to an extent. If the judge can decree that a dead deer is sacrosanct; What about a cow? Ergo, what about that cows liver …..

It’s – surely – an ‘offence’ against meat. Not an animal.

Still one of the most fucked up things I’ve read on here yet though! Jesus!

By: puppylover

puppylover — Mon, 27 Nov 2006 18:41:31 +0000

Sex with dead aniamals, should not be a crime. one could then be charged with wraping a new york around yourself for a good rub off. The attraction I understand also (in younger days I have pulled over and enjoyed a sexy deer or canine) it is the ability to do what you wish how you wish to the animal and doing it to a dead animal makes it all that much moere trilling. I supose it is just a Trill thing but it was fun years ago.. so if its dead lets not condem the poor guys for they might be a bit twisted but they could be off do far worse.

By: Lily

Lily — Sun, 26 Nov 2006 23:11:44 +0000

I guess I just don’t get having sex with animals (and dead one’s at that), he was pretty attrtactive so i’m guessing lack of dates wasn’t the reason behind this, I guess some people just have different tastes…

By: ladycara

ladycara — Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:15:20 +0000

maybe he just wanted to get as much fun as he could out of the roadkill before draging it home for his hillbilly sister-wife to cook up into wilderness stew mmmm hmmm.
it’s good for what ailes you!!

By: RJ45

RJ45 — Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:17:58 +0000

Necrozoophilia… damn, I was just writing about that one too. I think the same laws of nercophilia should apply. You wouldn’t want someone to violate your corpse…pretty certain a deer wouldn’t want that either. The language of the laws or not, these people are totally fucked up.

By: chad

chad — Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:59:38 +0000

OMG! Thats two dead animal fuckers in the same number of weeks!!! I think terrorists have been putting something in the water that fucks up peoples minds and makes them want to do these things.
I demand a war on erm…. errr….. Greenland! Well, ask yourself, what do you know about Greenland?…. Nothing! And they want to keep it that way so divert attention with this sort of shit!

By: Jeremy Haney

Jeremy Haney — Tue, 21 Nov 2006 03:38:35 +0000

Deer, I like very much!