<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Court Says Yes To Breasts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pervscan.com/2006/10/23/court-says-yes-to-breasts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pervscan.com/2006/10/23/court-says-yes-to-breasts/</link>
	<description>An Index to the Sordid and Depraved</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 01:21:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bobby</title>
		<link>http://pervscan.com/2006/10/23/court-says-yes-to-breasts/comment-page-1/#comment-25222</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 18:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pervscan.com/2006/10/20/court-says-yes-to-breasts/#comment-25222</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re all idiots.  Breasts aren&#039;t elbows or ankles.  Men love breasts.  They start to get us sexually excited.  There is absolutely no reason for anyone to walk around topless just for the hell of it either, male or female.  If that is your thing, they have beaches and what not for that sort of thing.

I think it is rediculous that you people think its because of the &quot;religious arse prude&quot; that going topless is illegal.  Next time you ladies get turned on by flabby man boobs, post another comment.  It has nothing to do with the body being &quot;naughty&quot;, but the fact that we don&#039;t want to be walking around with a constant hard on.  For one, its uncomfortable hiding them in our pants, and two, it can actually be a danger to our health to have one lasting more than four hours!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re all idiots.  Breasts aren&#8217;t elbows or ankles.  Men love breasts.  They start to get us sexually excited.  There is absolutely no reason for anyone to walk around topless just for the hell of it either, male or female.  If that is your thing, they have beaches and what not for that sort of thing.</p>
<p>I think it is rediculous that you people think its because of the &#8220;religious arse prude&#8221; that going topless is illegal.  Next time you ladies get turned on by flabby man boobs, post another comment.  It has nothing to do with the body being &#8220;naughty&#8221;, but the fact that we don&#8217;t want to be walking around with a constant hard on.  For one, its uncomfortable hiding them in our pants, and two, it can actually be a danger to our health to have one lasting more than four hours!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: booklover</title>
		<link>http://pervscan.com/2006/10/23/court-says-yes-to-breasts/comment-page-1/#comment-16962</link>
		<dc:creator>booklover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pervscan.com/2006/10/20/court-says-yes-to-breasts/#comment-16962</guid>
		<description>Interesting. The more I think about it, the more I believe that this isn&#039;t really a freedom of speech issue - but a question of equal rights. Men can bare their breasts with immunity. Where then is the constitutional basis for saying that women can not? How about a flat chested woman, whose breasts are no different than a man&#039;s? Just as gay marriage has made progress in some states on the theory that it is an &quot;equal protection under the law&quot; issue, this topic may as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. The more I think about it, the more I believe that this isn&#8217;t really a freedom of speech issue &#8211; but a question of equal rights. Men can bare their breasts with immunity. Where then is the constitutional basis for saying that women can not? How about a flat chested woman, whose breasts are no different than a man&#8217;s? Just as gay marriage has made progress in some states on the theory that it is an &#8220;equal protection under the law&#8221; issue, this topic may as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate B</title>
		<link>http://pervscan.com/2006/10/23/court-says-yes-to-breasts/comment-page-1/#comment-16635</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pervscan.com/2006/10/20/court-says-yes-to-breasts/#comment-16635</guid>
		<description>Funny thing, protesting. Aside from the fact that majority of boob bearing protesters are doing it for some kind of shock value, this shock fast becomes diverted from shock at whatever they are angry about, to shock at delfated, droopy sad excuses for breasts, that are horrifying.

I have always thought it unfair and sexist for woman to have two areas considered sexual and men have only one.

I have seen some completely flat chested women, and  men with horrendous man boobs. I see no reason to legislate chests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny thing, protesting. Aside from the fact that majority of boob bearing protesters are doing it for some kind of shock value, this shock fast becomes diverted from shock at whatever they are angry about, to shock at delfated, droopy sad excuses for breasts, that are horrifying.</p>
<p>I have always thought it unfair and sexist for woman to have two areas considered sexual and men have only one.</p>
<p>I have seen some completely flat chested women, and  men with horrendous man boobs. I see no reason to legislate chests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ladycara</title>
		<link>http://pervscan.com/2006/10/23/court-says-yes-to-breasts/comment-page-1/#comment-16459</link>
		<dc:creator>ladycara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 15:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pervscan.com/2006/10/20/court-says-yes-to-breasts/#comment-16459</guid>
		<description>a women should be able to breast feed her baby in public it is wrong to expect mothers to let their babies go hungery just so as not to offend some religious (arseh***) prude.
this win only covers women baring their breasts for the purposes of political protest.
because it somehow comes under America&#039;s free speech laws.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a women should be able to breast feed her baby in public it is wrong to expect mothers to let their babies go hungery just so as not to offend some religious (arseh***) prude.<br />
this win only covers women baring their breasts for the purposes of political protest.<br />
because it somehow comes under America&#8217;s free speech laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mistress V</title>
		<link>http://pervscan.com/2006/10/23/court-says-yes-to-breasts/comment-page-1/#comment-16420</link>
		<dc:creator>Mistress V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pervscan.com/2006/10/20/court-says-yes-to-breasts/#comment-16420</guid>
		<description>It is sad something as natural  as breasts, can cause so much wasted time and tax payer money. I loathe what religion has done to make the body so naughty.

Amazing two mounds of fat [which mine are fab by the way] and a source to feed the babies of the world, yet people say it is &quot;bad&quot;.

No wonder so many hate themselves these days, because everything they were taught about sexuality and life was to be ashamed of who they are not proud of the &quot;essence of life&quot; 

Yay for the win, now I think I am going to show My  ta ta&#039;s to some stranger. [laughs]

Mistress V




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is sad something as natural  as breasts, can cause so much wasted time and tax payer money. I loathe what religion has done to make the body so naughty.</p>
<p>Amazing two mounds of fat [which mine are fab by the way] and a source to feed the babies of the world, yet people say it is &#8220;bad&#8221;.</p>
<p>No wonder so many hate themselves these days, because everything they were taught about sexuality and life was to be ashamed of who they are not proud of the &#8220;essence of life&#8221; </p>
<p>Yay for the win, now I think I am going to show My  ta ta&#8217;s to some stranger. [laughs]</p>
<p>Mistress V</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

