Court Says 25,500 Euros Is Too Much To Fondle Bosom
“A fee of 25,500 euros is way too much for a woman to charge a man for fondling her bosom, a Finnish district court ruled. The court jailed a couple in their twenties for more than a year for charging a 74-year-old who suffers from dementia a total of 25,500 euros to enjoy the woman’s breasts on 10 occasions. ‘Based on general life experience alone, it is indisputably clear that a 25,500 euro charge is disproportionate to the compensation in question,’ Judge Hasse Hakki, who heard the case, told Reuters on Friday. But he said the court in Kokkola, about 480 km north of Helsinki, would not decide ‘the proper financial value of the compensation’. The pensioner filed charges against the couple, who were convicted of extortionate overcharging, even though he told the court he paid the price willingly at the time.” — Yahoo (US)
At first blush, you’d have to agree that charging about $2500 USD to grope some breasts is a bit excessive. But then, who’s to say? Maybe the young lady in question had genuinely phenomenal breasts. After all, if the seller were Angelina Jolie or Salma Hayek, you might think that a few grand per grope is quite a reasonable fee. But does that mean that the breasts of a celebrity are intrinsically more valuable than those of some girl next door? How do you put a price tag on human flesh? How do you establish the going rate for a body part?
In the final analysis, though, this case comes down to one thing: the pensioner “paid the price willingly at the time.” Yes, he seems to suffer from some dementia, but if his dementia isn’t sufficient to prevent him from recognizing ex post facto the error of his ways, and if his dementia isn’t sufficient to prevent him from hiring a lawyer and pursuing a complaint, then how is it sufficient to compromise his original consent? It doesn’t make sense. If someone offers you a million dollars for a kiss, then plainly it must have seemed worth it to him. So too in this case: if the pensioner was willing to pay a few grand a grope, over and over again, then it would seem that he thought he was getting fair value for his investment. How can the law say otherwise?
I don’t have 25,500 euros on me right now, but I’m willing to take out a loan for the chance to bury my mug between Selmas’ mountains…I’d wait from “Dusk to Dawn” for that!!!
i want to bury my mug and than my cock between her huge juggs shoot my cum all over them as she smokes a cigarett
$2500 USD/10 incidents = $250 USD per groping session – a far cry from “a few grand per grope.” Sloppy, sloppy. Unless you intended that that’s the amount an “average man” might pay, rather than the amount this specific man paid. In which case, you were unclear and seemed to imply that he had paid a few grand a groping. Still sloppy, either way.
I retract my previous statement.
“for charging a 74-year-old who suffers from dementia a total of 25,500 euros to enjoy the woman’s breasts on 10 occasions.”
Clearly she charged 2,550 euros a grope. I had missed a 0 in my reading and jumped the gun on commenting. My bad.
Really it’s the headline that’s misleading, and that’s a shame on the newspaper.
All comments become the property of PervScan. You must use an email address to post a comment. However, PervScan disallows email addresses in the text of comments.
Mouth to Mouth