<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clinical Web Site May Be Target 0f Porn Seekers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pervscan.com/2006/04/24/clinical-web-site-may-be-target-0f-porn-seekers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pervscan.com/2006/04/24/clinical-web-site-may-be-target-0f-porn-seekers/</link>
	<description>An Index to the Sordid and Depraved</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:18:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://pervscan.com/2006/04/24/clinical-web-site-may-be-target-0f-porn-seekers/comment-page-1/#comment-9422</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 03:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pervscan.com/2006/04/21/clinical-web-site-may-be-target-0f-porn-seekers/#comment-9422</guid>
		<description>When I was a kid porn was higher quality. The pictures were all highly professional film photos taking by real pros. The amount of detail in an image was much higher than the crap you find online. And a lot of non-porn magazines had pages and pages of hardcore porn advertisements in the back pages. They&#039;d cover some things withy tiny stars but everything was clearly visible.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was a kid porn was higher quality. The pictures were all highly professional film photos taking by real pros. The amount of detail in an image was much higher than the crap you find online. And a lot of non-porn magazines had pages and pages of hardcore porn advertisements in the back pages. They&#8217;d cover some things withy tiny stars but everything was clearly visible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regina Lynn</title>
		<link>http://pervscan.com/2006/04/24/clinical-web-site-may-be-target-0f-porn-seekers/comment-page-1/#comment-9409</link>
		<dc:creator>Regina Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pervscan.com/2006/04/21/clinical-web-site-may-be-target-0f-porn-seekers/#comment-9409</guid>
		<description>It could be that people with skin concerns on their genitals are more likely to research online -- thoroughly -- before they head to the doctor. Moles, splotches and rashes and so on are much scarier when they show up on your genitals than on your elbow.

Of course, the fetish and pornographic site referrals do suggest otherwise ... LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could be that people with skin concerns on their genitals are more likely to research online &#8212; thoroughly &#8212; before they head to the doctor. Moles, splotches and rashes and so on are much scarier when they show up on your genitals than on your elbow.</p>
<p>Of course, the fetish and pornographic site referrals do suggest otherwise &#8230; LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
