Bestiality Week: Closing Remarks
This last week the term bestiality has been stretched to include such seemingly disparate kinks as zoosadism and furry, and the week has also been stretched to accomodate a few extra stories. The latter may even be the most surprising part, since there are so many instances of bestiality in the news that it would be easy to continue Bestiality Week for at least a few more days, perhaps even indefinitely. By now you’ve probably all heard about the Arizona fire chief caught in a barn with his pants down. “You caught me… I tried to (expletive) your sheep,” he told the neighbor who discovered him. There’s the Antigua man caught with a cow: “It is reported that in order to control the distressed animal, the man tied the head of the cow to a tree and tied its hind legs together.” There’s the on-going trial of Brendan Francis McMahon, the “Buggy Bunner” financier. (Look at his picture. Evidently bestiality and animal cruelty charges didn’t detract from his self-conscious cool.) Etc.
While it is difficult to say that bestiality itself is on the increase, it seems pretty obvious that people are becoming more and more aware of bestiality, in whatever form it takes. (And probably there will be still newer forms to come…) Obviously this is being fuelled by the internet. On one hand, the net makes bestiality porn much easier to find. You don’t have to smuggle it home from Holland anymore, like people had to back in the 1970s. On the other hand, the internet also makes it possible for zoophiles to form a mutually supportive community. Don’t be surprised if in the coming years you really do see a small but vocal movement of bestialists striving to gain acceptance for their perversion. Instead of “We’re here, we’re queer, get used to it,” you’ll be hearing something like, “We’re queer for steer, get used to it.”
A movement like this would probably find modest pockets of acceptance. Conservatives already fret that the legitimization of homosexuality will lead to the same for bestiality, necrophilia, and all sorts of other weird kinks. Listen to this guy: “And just as words like ‘gay’ and ‘transgender’ have now replaced ‘homosexual’ or ‘cross dresser,’ the sickos calling for relaxed laws on bestiality are developing their own little vocabulary as well. Believe it or not, if your proclivities run to a wild Saturday night with Fido or Fluffy, you might just be a ‘zoophile.’ Of course, as a normal human being who thinks this sort of activity should be discouraged, I would be classified as a ‘zoophobe.’ And I was just getting use to being called a ‘homophobe.’” No doubt a guy like this presages a reaction against the increased visibility of bestiality. Thanks to the notorious Enumclaw horse sex case, the state of Washington has just passed a law expressly forbidding bestiality. There are now 32 states in America that ban bestiality. Can it be long before others follow suit?
If there are any women from South Africa interested in learning dogsex, I have trained many many women how to experience the joy of this age-old practice.
If ure interested mail me
EMAIL ADDRESSES NOT ALLOWED. PLEASE REFER TO PERVSCAN’S POLICY ON EMAIL ADDRESSES.
‘Yet again, a perversion takes away another word, zoo’, as proclaimed by emerging ‘anti-zoo’ communities.
‘We’re going to the zoo’, will no longer make sense, many of the anti-zoo say.
‘It is the same when we used to say joy, meant to say good, now it means homosexual; that’s why we prefer to call them all bestialists’.
‘Homophile used to mean to love humanity, now it means to love passionately, the same sex; zoophile used mean to love non-human animals, soon it will mean to love passionately, non-humans’.
The difference between a erotic zoophile, and a bestialist, is, according to people like Dr Miletski, ‘zoophiles’ love their animals (and have sex for two-way pleasure affection), and ‘bestialists’ don’t love their animals, they are purely coercive self-pleasers (perhaps desperate or dominant (having power over ‘lesser beings’)), with the possibility they hate non-humans.
Zoosadists, on the other hand, are just people who beat animals for coercion, power, venting of anger, and self-gratification (pleasurable/sexual sadism).
Zoosadism is an adopted term for anyone who commits physical cruelty/harm on an animal; only a small percentage of zoosadists are zoosexual, and all zoosadists often look upon animals as being gross, lesser, pathetic, bad, etc; and hence only harm animals in hatred, or for venting anger. Of course, you get the odd ripper, but they aren’t ‘zoophile’, because ‘zoophilie’ means to ‘love’. Bestiality becomes zoosadism, when you ‘brutally’ rape an animal into having sex with you; bestiality remains bestiality, when non-brutal rape (bribery, fence-hopping, non-consent, sex training) an animal into having sex with them.
Both zoosadism and bestiality are the bad counterparts of zoophilia, that bring down ‘animal lovers’ of the ‘erotic level’ (zoophiles), down with animal sadists and rapists.
It is just like calling a whole sexuality, even when most are non-rapist, all rapist.
People look upon ‘adult’ non-human animals, as ‘children’, and hence compared ‘erotic zoophilia’, to ‘erotic pedophilia’, even when the animal, once mature is capable of sustaining ‘non-violent’ sex emotionally and physically.
Therefore, as long as the animal is not forced, harmed, or bribed (a true, loving zoophile doesn’t do), it isn’t wrong, technically.
Thanks for reading my comments.
All comments become the property of PervScan. You must use an email address to post a comment. However, PervScan disallows email addresses in the text of comments.
HQ Videos