If you apply metaphysics, we can map a person’s orientation into the following three:
*Gender-Orientation.
*Species-Orientation.
*Age-Orientation.

You can see he has two ‘known’ sets of direct sexualities (corresponding with the above tenses)…
1. Heterosexual (Gynephile); Human (Homo Sapien Sapien, Unknown Race); Pre-Pubescent Age Range (9).
2. Unknown; Dog (Canine, Unknown Breed); Unknown Age Range (Unknown Age).

The zoophile community says ‘this paraphile is a deviant, and has nothing to do with zoophilia, he is just a sick bestialist, who wanted to dominate lesser beings; no matter if his victims were animal or human, underage, or of age; he just perverted whatever he could get his hands on, and what he fancied which were, a weak child, and a weak dog; reason for his choice was, it was easy for him to coerce his horrific, sadistic desires on weaker, available beings’, ‘perhaps his acts were down to desperation, anger venting, mental illness, or ruthless experimentation, etc; just like any other sick, weirdo’; ‘with more stories like these, selected by the media, innocent zoophiles are being battered socially in the name of these ’sadistic’ people, zoophiles are normal people who’s interests just happen to be a different species; just this guy found something he could easily get his hands on, that was weaker than a human, to work out his horrific desires; they are biastophiles, they belong in that category, not ours’.

So even the zoophile community have something to say about this case, and similar.

Thanks for reading my comments.