Comments on: Bestiality Week

By: Dr James D Smith

Dr James D Smith — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:37:47 +0000

Dear aurelius,
The Old Testament inhibited the book of Torah, Leviticus, for the purpose only, of collective research for scholars during the translation between the two ‘Jewish’ languages, Ancient Hebrew and Classical Hebrew.

Christian people, often say bestiality is wrong, and condemned in the Christian Bible, even though the Abrahamic God, ‘The Lord’, ‘God’, was said to have given rules only to the sojourns, and that the sojourners could only stay in the promised land, for as long as they followed the Levitical laws.

There’s no clue as to whether the non-sojourns should be expected to follow the rules, but the sojourns were made mandatory, but not the non-sojourns.

And the contrast between the passages in Leviticus and new Christian laws, Christians say they should not obey the Levitical laws whatsoever, they were not made for them.

But the Christianity fanatics whom follow every part of the ‘Holy Bible’, even what they shouldn’t / have to; use Leviticus as a keen example “to not defile oneself by laying with a ‘beast’”; let alone is it ‘unchristian’ to call the Abrahamic God’s ‘creatures’, ‘beasts’; they use it, even when ‘Christians’ aren’t supposed to follow such laws, and because most of the Western World’s traditions are Christian, this means that the idea of banning bestiality, as being immoral, perverted, and against God’s will, is against their own religion and proper culture, in the ethical sense.

Society and religion follows ’some’ of these rules for ‘deeper’ control over the ‘aberrant’, via suppression by law/outcasting such people, in protection of their own morals they obey mandatorily and naturalistically, and opinion, they fight the opposition, which is bestiality on this matter, for its ‘moral worth’; whether they realise it themselves, or not.

Thank you for reading my comments.

By: intothewind

intothewind — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 16:20:33 +0000

Thanks PervScan for “Bestiality Week”. While the stories are very enlightning, the comments afford different perspectives and ideas to contemplate.
Keep up the good work!

By: Treadlok

Treadlok — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:48:55 +0000

What is interesting about the newer rash of morality prohibition against it, is the double standard. The latest state against bestiality, is Washington (thanks totally on the Enemclaw horse incident). But, instead of focusing on the sex, they’ve focused into “abuse”, and added it to the animal abuse statute. Never mind accepted husbandry practices that allows, and is common to; box, boot, hobble, and twitch a mare to make her stand still and not say no to the stallion. Where is the consent in that?!? What is the difference, from the stallions point of view, whether the person jacking him off catches in a bag (for money) or the floor?

By: aurelius

aurelius — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 03:55:42 +0000

The whole problem with the moral prohibition against bestiality is that it’s still based in Old Testament teachings, and they unquestionably believed that sex with animals resulted in the birth of chimeras. We know better now. However, as you’ve said, why is it more moral to strangle or decapitate the animal in order to use it as food that it is to have sex with it?
Perhaps the most logical reasoning is that it comes down to the ability to give informed and knowledgeable consent, as in pedophilia. However, you still run up against the idea that the animal most likely isn’t giving it’s consent to being used as food either. Short of vegetarianism there seems to be no real answer.

By: Husk

Husk — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 04:10:54 +0000

” Inspector Oghiokijaie Alphonsus had arrested the convict at the Chanchaga abattoir two weeks ago after he allegedly had sex with the sheep resulting in the death of the animal. ”

Eh?! Ok. So I guess we surmise that he did something to this sheep which caused it’s ‘Untimely’ demise but, more importantly, in a more horrendous manner than slashing it’s throat. That’s got to have something to do with the case, surely?

Which begs the question: How in hell does a young guy fuck a sheep to death???

Maybe that’s how come they caught him? If the damn sheep expired from his attentions, it must have been quite the event going off in that pen there.

Mind boggling.