Contact PervScan RSS Feed Banners for PervScan
 
PervScan is for adults only. If you are under 18, you must leave now.

Gitmo Soldier Details Sexual Tactics

“Female interrogators tried to break Muslim detainees at the U.S. prison camp in Guantanamo Bay by sexual touching, wearing a miniskirt and thong underwear and in one case smearing a Saudi man’s face with fake menstrual blood, according to an insider’s written account… One female civilian contractor used a special outfit that included a miniskirt, thong underwear and a bra during late-night interrogations with prisoners, mostly Muslim men who consider it taboo to have close contact with women who aren’t their wives… The interrogator left the room to ask a Muslim linguist how she could break the prisoner’s reliance on God. The linguist told her to tell the detainee that she was menstruating, touch him, then make sure to turn off the water in his cell so he couldn’t wash… ‘The concept was to make the detainee feel that after talking to her he was unclean and was unable to go before his God in prayer and gain strength,’ says the draft, stamped ‘Secret…’ ‘She then started to place her hands in her pants as she walked behind the detainee,’ he says. ‘As she circled around him he could see that she was taking her hand out of her pants. When it became visible the detainee saw what appeared to be red blood on her hand. She said, ‘Who sent you to Arizona?’ He then glared at her with a piercing look of hatred. ‘She then wiped the red ink on his face. He shouted at the top of his lungs, spat at her and lunged forward’ — so fiercely that he broke loose from one ankle shackle. ‘He began to cry like a baby,’ the draft says, noting the interrogator left saying, ‘Have a fun night in your cell without any water to clean yourself.’” —Newsday (US)

(Thanks to alanr for the link.)

Oh, those poor little terrorists. It’s not right, is it? It’s not just. It’s not humane. They go around bombing and beheading, and how do we respond? With unjustified use of exhibitionistic force. We torture them with titties, frighten them with thongs, humiliate them with vaginal emissions. Doesn’t this violate the Geneva Convention? After all, one victim even got an erection during his interrogation. Oh the shame, the horror, the abuses of human rights! He must have been begging to receive a mere beating instead. “Pull out my fingernails with pliers,” he must have cried. “Stick a cow probe in my rectum! Anything! Just don’t give me a boner, pleeeeaase.” You can hear him break down in sobs from here.

Jesus. Get real. No doubt every one of you who enjoys the sight and touch of a female is thinking the same thing. “I did it! I masterminded 9/11! I’m Osama bin Laden’s best friend! I know all the secrets — everything! Come interrogate me!” How bad can it be to have a buff female soldier give you a little lapdance? Ask any of the poor grunts who were tortured in Vietnam if they think these lewd interrogation techniques are inhumane. They’ll wake up from their post-traumatic-stress nightmares to laugh at you.

 
Comments Total: 12
Smijey
Jan 31 2005
11:39 pm

If you had a Jewish terrorist prisoner, would you make him eat pork? If you had a Christian terrorist prisoner, would you rub a naked male soldier against him?

I don’t know whether ‘extreme’ interrogation techniques should or should not be used. But dragging a person’s religious beliefs through the mud should not be used. That is one path we dare not tread, not after Hitler.

SuperPhreak
Jan 31 2005
11:44 pm

You bet your liberall ass I’d make a jew prisoner eat pork and I’d rub a naked guy against a “Christian terrorist prisoner.” That shit’s not torture, man. Or if it is torture, it’s not in the same class as the brutal shit they pull in Somalia, Chechnya, ‘Nam. Hell, it’s better than what Saddam did to his own people. Wouldn’t you rather eat a dead frog’s ass than have electrodes put on your balls? I would.

hludens
Feb 3 2005
11:31 am

Meatheads, thou shalt not suffer a witch to live, so let’s torture their confessions, an old and hallowed tradition.

(Declare them guilty, then …..) or as in Alice

No, no! said the Queen. Sentence first–verdict afterwards.

Stuff and nonsense! said Alice loudly. The idea of having the sentence first!

bizzitch
Feb 4 2005
8:43 pm

Why didn’t they take pictures of the female interrogaters doing their thing instead of the mountain of naked man goo we were bombarded with? We would have had more fun while expressing our “outrage” over the so-called prison torture scandal.

rene moncayo
Feb 5 2005
2:57 pm

You’re very shallow in your commentary. First confusing sadam with osama which clearly is against the 911 commission report.. Would you confuse a skinhead with a chemotherapy patient?
Anyhow you say this isn’t psychological torture and you consider these proisoners guilty before being triede. As well as perhaps supporting the invasion of Iraq. Had you heard what the Gi’s had done to that old woman they humiliated? Of course they’re all sand nigegrs less than human. Infermensch. If sadam did worse with hi opponents that means all the more comedy?
You deserve to edit for http://www.viz.co.uk then
Btw, remember that the US didn’t lift a finger before with Sadam and had in fact supplied him with weaponry. I sure hope you get laid enough on a daily baisis. So you can use your penis than more than just a substitute for your cerebral cortex.
BTW feel free to email me-
you could use the mature conversation

George
Feb 6 2005
9:31 am

Innocent until proven guilty, but a terrorist unless you’re sure otherwise?

And whether something is psychological torture depends on whether it’s justified?

Just because you, O writer, are turned on by what you’re writing about is no excuse for turning off your critical faculties.

Rational Female
Feb 6 2005
9:46 am

The point of interrogation tactics is to elicit evidence. The point of the evidence is to help determine whether or not the accused is innocent or guilty. People who are guilty LIE, and therefore interrogation tactics attempt to induce people to tell the truth. This makes the tactics uncomfortable, mentally painful and sometimes physically painful too.

For this reason, there are standards governing interrogation tactics. It goes without saying that these tactics are stressful, the standards do not mandate that the tactics be pain- or stress-free. They simply mandate that the tactics fall within a certain range, a tolerable but not tortuous degree of stress.

In that light, the tactics used at Gitmo are stressful but not torturuous. They apply psychological pressure but they do not cause physical injury. When you compare these tactics to those used in numerous other countries around the world, you’ll see that they’re very mild. And if they help to separate the truth-tellers from the liars — if they separate the innocent from the terrorists — then they are justified.

Anonymous
Feb 8 2005
8:52 pm

To smijey dragging religion into it should not be aloud are you crazy their own religious leaders gave osama permission to attack us. The way their religion reads its ok to kill us all of us if they want because in the past we wronged them. Just remember they still have their God’s permission to kill us and will try again. They are willing to die to murder our families I think its just freaking peachy to use their religion against them. I did not attack them neither did you but in their eyes it is still ok to murder us for the injustice so you go ahead and pamper them because of the word religion but remember their religion wants you dead!

Jones
Mar 25 2005
8:34 pm

I think it’s funny that this website gets all sorts of comments that are pro this and that of all sorts of sexual activites illegal or not, but when you post an article about sexual “torture” people get their panties all bunched up.

Mike
May 3 2005
3:49 pm

You bunch of retards that know nothing about what you talking.

Female or male torturing someone is illegal and have nothing to do in a country that defend human liberty and democracy.

In this way we act as other totalitarian act.

Who cares what kind of torture it is, it is not human. that’s it.

You cant say someone is terrorist unless you prove it.

That’s fucking retard thinking is getting us back 200 years ago.

You mother fucker confederates should took the place in guantanamo bay instead of young people that were conscripted by talibans and terrorist groups and apparently have nothing to do there,

and then come to tell me if it is nice and describe me the treatment youll have as stressfull but not torture.

you fuckin retard

Jerry
May 20 2005
10:06 pm

I ‘ve read all these posts and many more. In short,
The prisoners that were mildly humiliated playing naked leapfrog and walk the dog will get to go home A_L_I_V_E one day (if not already)unless they are found guilty. Also these fellas are not Taliban / Al Quaida conscripts. They are dedicated followers of Islamic Fundamentalism. Islam in general condones the killing of Infedels. This variety is much more radical and need to be reigned in from within by the more mainstream clerics and Imams for the good of all Muslims. I have some Muslim friends and I am not a racist or a biggot.I’ve been told this by my Muslim friends. These types of radical Islamic fundamentalism are spawned in the ghettos of large cities in Jordan, Israel, Syria ,Iraq, Iran and other large Middle Eastern cities. These guys become indoctrinated as young unemployed teens and young adults. They are promised the 72,etc, etc and fall for the whole bit. Not drug into it kicking and screaming. These countries need to educate their populace and put together economies
to curb the 25 – 30% unemployment they so enjoy.
We have to fight this thing to win quick and big. Being miss manners doesn’t battles or win wars. We need to win this war over there and protect our borders now or we will have a couple of hundred thousand foriegn fighters here masquerading as ordinary illegals.Think about it.
Jerry a cocerned American father and friend

Monty
Oct 5 2005
5:21 pm

>You mother fucker confederates should took the >place in guantanamo bay instead of young people >that were conscripted by talibans and terrorist >groups and apparently have nothing to do there,
>and then come to tell me if it is nice and >describe me the treatment youll have as >stressfull but not torture.
>you fuckin retard
>Posted by Mike on May 3rd, 2005 at 3:49 pm

Wow, dude. You need to slow down and take a couple of deep breaths before your bleeding liberal heart explodes. And what’s all this about ‘Confederates’? You’re the one that types and spells like you’re from some backwoods country holler in the deep South. YEEEEAH! That’s right, beatch. Score is now Monty-1, Liberal Fag-0!

Add Comment  
Comment Policy

All comments become the property of PervScan. You must use an email address to post a comment. However, PervScan disallows email addresses in the text of comments.

Required and published
Required but not published