<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cup and Gown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pervscan.com/2004/06/16/cup-and-gown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pervscan.com/2004/06/16/cup-and-gown/</link>
	<description>An Index to the Sordid and Depraved</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 01:21:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mamasboy</title>
		<link>http://pervscan.com/2004/06/16/cup-and-gown/comment-page-1/#comment-29604</link>
		<dc:creator>mamasboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pervscan.com/blog/?p=364#comment-29604</guid>
		<description>my x wife always hated my mother iam a jugg man and mothers juggs are a lot bigger than hers my x wife slide a pack of cigaretts between her 38&quot; d my mother slides a hole cartoon of cigaretts between her 48&quot; fff mellons i naturaly pull the smokes out before i jugg fuck her mother chain smoking as i hump her smoky juggs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my x wife always hated my mother iam a jugg man and mothers juggs are a lot bigger than hers my x wife slide a pack of cigaretts between her 38&#8243; d my mother slides a hole cartoon of cigaretts between her 48&#8243; fff mellons i naturaly pull the smokes out before i jugg fuck her mother chain smoking as i hump her smoky juggs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mamasboy</title>
		<link>http://pervscan.com/2004/06/16/cup-and-gown/comment-page-1/#comment-25653</link>
		<dc:creator>mamasboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 05:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pervscan.com/blog/?p=364#comment-25653</guid>
		<description>YOU SAY 18 GETTING BOOB JOBS I JUST BOUGHT MY 77 Y O MOTHER A HUGE JUGG JOB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YOU SAY 18 GETTING BOOB JOBS I JUST BOUGHT MY 77 Y O MOTHER A HUGE JUGG JOB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bkbigfish</title>
		<link>http://pervscan.com/2004/06/16/cup-and-gown/comment-page-1/#comment-1880</link>
		<dc:creator>bkbigfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 12:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pervscan.com/blog/?p=364#comment-1880</guid>
		<description>You mentioned on a link to this page that, according to a recent study, up to 93% of breast implants rupture within 10 years.  I assume that you got this from an incomplete news article, rather than the report itself, because the report itself pointed out that there is no database or study that actually confirms how many breast implants rupture for any but small population groups.  They came up with many different rupture rates from different studies, the highest of which happened to be about 90%.  This was in no way representative of their overall population sample, and in no way reflects the reality.

Look at it reasonably -- if 90% of all breast implants ruptured within 10 years, don&#039;t you think it would be a big story?  At the very least, the surgeons who remove them would be reporting huge numbers of replaced implants.

Please search for related news articles, look at the original report, or alter your website to reflect the fact that the news article you took your 93% rate from was playing up the extreme high end of estimates in order to attract more readers.  Even though you may be morally or aesthetically opposed to breast implants, I don&#039;t believe it is justified to passively pass on misleading or erroneous information that happens to support your position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mentioned on a link to this page that, according to a recent study, up to 93% of breast implants rupture within 10 years.  I assume that you got this from an incomplete news article, rather than the report itself, because the report itself pointed out that there is no database or study that actually confirms how many breast implants rupture for any but small population groups.  They came up with many different rupture rates from different studies, the highest of which happened to be about 90%.  This was in no way representative of their overall population sample, and in no way reflects the reality.</p>
<p>Look at it reasonably &#8212; if 90% of all breast implants ruptured within 10 years, don&#8217;t you think it would be a big story?  At the very least, the surgeons who remove them would be reporting huge numbers of replaced implants.</p>
<p>Please search for related news articles, look at the original report, or alter your website to reflect the fact that the news article you took your 93% rate from was playing up the extreme high end of estimates in order to attract more readers.  Even though you may be morally or aesthetically opposed to breast implants, I don&#8217;t believe it is justified to passively pass on misleading or erroneous information that happens to support your position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hludens</title>
		<link>http://pervscan.com/2004/06/16/cup-and-gown/comment-page-1/#comment-1007</link>
		<dc:creator>hludens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pervscan.com/blog/?p=364#comment-1007</guid>
		<description>Well, yes and 20 years later they want breast reduction and lipisuction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, yes and 20 years later they want breast reduction and lipisuction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hludens</title>
		<link>http://pervscan.com/2004/06/16/cup-and-gown/comment-page-1/#comment-1008</link>
		<dc:creator>hludens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pervscan.com/blog/?p=364#comment-1008</guid>
		<description>For our ancestral preferences:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hominids.com/donsmaps/venus.html&quot;&gt;http://www.hominids.com/donsmaps/venus.html&lt;/a&gt;
Venus Figures from the stone age, the paleolithic version of Playmate of the Month.

Desmond Morris contends that the breasts mimic the buttocks, sexual attraction having ben transposed from the rear to the front, lips of the genetalia replicated so to speak in the painted lips of the face, and the plump cushy buttocks finding themselves duplicated in the breasts, a redundancy devoutly to be wished.

If only these girls (and their parents) understood that from the evolutionary viewpoint they are simply trying to make themselves more sexually available . . . -- maybe they do understand, and they are simply trying to attract a wide number of potential mates from with to choose.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For our ancestral preferences:<br />
<a href="http://www.hominids.com/donsmaps/venus.html">http://www.hominids.com/donsmaps/venus.html</a><br />
Venus Figures from the stone age, the paleolithic version of Playmate of the Month.</p>
<p>Desmond Morris contends that the breasts mimic the buttocks, sexual attraction having ben transposed from the rear to the front, lips of the genetalia replicated so to speak in the painted lips of the face, and the plump cushy buttocks finding themselves duplicated in the breasts, a redundancy devoutly to be wished.</p>
<p>If only these girls (and their parents) understood that from the evolutionary viewpoint they are simply trying to make themselves more sexually available . . . &#8212; maybe they do understand, and they are simply trying to attract a wide number of potential mates from with to choose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

